Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at STL

Blue Jackets hold off the Blues

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:27 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
5
Home
STL
St. Louis Blues
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.35Expected goals2.95
53% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)33
3High-danger chances2
52Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus won 5–3 despite St. Louis controlling the game—59% of shot attempts and a 3.35–2.95 expected-goals edge. The Blue Jackets overperformed their expected goals by 1.65, a variance line reflecting both elite finishing and shaky goaltending.

Columbus scored twice from low-danger spots, the kind of margin goalies should protect. On the rush, they were lethal—four goals on 25 chances, an unsustainable rate.

J. Binnington finished at 0.818 on 22 shots, 0.65 goals below expectation. That gap is the difference between a 4–3 game and a blowout.

St. Louis had volume without precision. High-danger chances went 3–2 their way, but only two of their three goals came from dangerous areas. The rest was noise.

Mason Marchment's wrist shot from the point at 19:30 of the first period set the tone. Columbus never gave it back.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ1 / 3 · 1.42 xG
STL0 / 2 · 0.49 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ2 / 12 · 1.16 xG
STL2 / 16 · 1.69 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ2 / 37 · 0.76 xG
STL1 / 40 · 0.77 xG

CBJ went 2-for-37 from low danger on 0.76 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
5 G · 3.35 xG · +1.6
STL
3 G · 2.95 xG · +0.1
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GreavesCBJ
-0.0
J. BinningtonSTL
-0.7

CBJ finished +1.6 against expected, STL +0.1 — J. Binnington (STL) allowed 0.7 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST3/21
SLAP1/6
SNAP0/5
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/4
OTHER0/11
STL
WRIST3/29
SLAP0/6
SNAP0/5
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/3
OTHER0/11
CBJ
STL
Off the rush
4 G on 25 · 1.43 xG
1 G on 31 · 2.26 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.19 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.30 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 3-for-21, STL 3-for-29. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Schenn
#10 · C · STL
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 17:34 TOI · -1
J. Snuggerud
#21 · R · STL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:06 TOI · -1
J. Berggren
#29 · R · STL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 13:46 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • STL had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • CBJ scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • CBJ outperformed their expected goals by 1.6 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at STL · 7:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Blues: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 3:26 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
CBJ
Model favorite
50%
50%
CBJ50STL

CBJ by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.52.5 STL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →STL
52.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
51.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.63xGF / 602.34
2.43xGA / 602.40
2.12Goals for / gm2.00
1.98Goals against / gm2.12
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.000

CBJ holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.000) says CBJ has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.5 final score with the Blue Jackets at exactly 50% win probability. Columbus and St. Louis are as evenly matched as a regular-season game gets.

Columbus owns the underlying shot quality by a narrow margin. The Blue Jackets generate 52.0% of 5v5 expected goals, while the Blues manage 49.0%—a modest but measurable edge that suggests Columbus will press play. The same advantage shows up in territory: Columbus drives 51.0% of shot attempts to St. Louis's 48.0%. These metrics suggest the Jackets will control the game's rhythm, though not by enough to break a coin flip.

Both teams' goal production tracks roughly where it should. Columbus's PDO sits at 1.003, virtually at true talent level, as does St. Louis's at 1.000, meaning neither team is riding shooting luck or broken by it. This is a game between two evenly constructed rosters.

Watch Boone Jenner for Columbus. At 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes, Jenner is Columbus's most dangerous finisher—he's combined that shot quality with 11 goals and a 9.6% shooting rate that suggests he's converting at a sustainable clip. Mathieu Olivier supplies secondary scoring punch at 0.89 xG/60 with 12 goals, and his 13.3% shooting rate indicates he's finding space on chances that matter.

St. Louis counters with Jimmy Snuggerud, who generates 0.86 expected goals per 60 to lead the Blues. Despite ranking slightly behind Jenner in underlying metrics, Snuggerud has 15 goals—a sign that he finishes at an 11.9% rate that outpaces his xG. Dylan Holloway rounds out the forward group at 0.82 xG/60 with 13 goals, though his 10.8% shooting rate suggests his total is closer to sustainable levels.

The structural advantage belongs to Columbus: better possession metrics, superior shot quality, territorial control. But the Blues' current goal totals—especially Snuggerud's 15—suggest St. Louis is punching slightly above its underlying play. That variance could cut either way in a single game.

The real story is the margin itself: two teams so evenly matched that the model can only shrug. Columbus will likely dictate play. Whether that translates to two points is the question no advance metric can answer.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters