Blue Jackets hold off the Blues
The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Columbus won 5–3 despite St. Louis controlling the game—59% of shot attempts and a 3.35–2.95 expected-goals edge. The Blue Jackets overperformed their expected goals by 1.65, a variance line reflecting both elite finishing and shaky goaltending.
Columbus scored twice from low-danger spots, the kind of margin goalies should protect. On the rush, they were lethal—four goals on 25 chances, an unsustainable rate.
J. Binnington finished at 0.818 on 22 shots, 0.65 goals below expectation. That gap is the difference between a 4–3 game and a blowout.
St. Louis had volume without precision. High-danger chances went 3–2 their way, but only two of their three goals came from dangerous areas. The rest was noise.
Mason Marchment's wrist shot from the point at 19:30 of the first period set the tone. Columbus never gave it back.
The danger ladder
CBJ went 2-for-37 from low danger on 0.76 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
CBJ finished +1.6 against expected, STL +0.1 — J. Binnington (STL) allowed 0.7 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 3-for-21, STL 3-for-29. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- STL had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- CBJ scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 25 rush chances.
- CBJ outperformed their expected goals by 1.6 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.