Backcheck
Recap · SEA at VGK

Kraken steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

The Kraken stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.39–3.56 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:37 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
SEA
Seattle Kraken
3
Home
VGK
Vegas Golden Knights
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.39Expected goals3.56
60% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)29
4High-danger chances5
46Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 39% / 61%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Golden Knights controlled 60% of expected goals at 5v5, yet lost 3-2. The game hinged entirely on goaltending: J. Daccord stopped 1.56 goals above expected, while A. Schmid underperformed his xG by 0.61. Vegas generated the quality; Seattle seized the opportunity.

The Golden Knights held 57% of shot attempts (29–22 on goal) and five high-danger chances to Seattle's four. Kaapo Kakko's backhander from the slot at 03:18 of the third period turned the game. Seattle converted 2 of 3 rebound chances; Vegas created three and converted zero. On the rush, the Golden Knights scored twice on 26 chances, yet no amount of volume offset the goaltending gap.

Vegas's metrics were dominant—60% of expected goals, 57% of shot attempts, five high-danger chances—but none of it mattered. A. Schmid faced manageable looks and failed to execute. J. Daccord faced tougher ones and exceeded expectations.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SEA0 / 4 · 0.76 xG
VGK1 / 5 · 1.17 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SEA3 / 9 · 1.05 xG
VGK1 / 16 · 1.80 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SEA0 / 33 · 0.58 xG
VGK0 / 39 · 0.58 xG

SEA went 3-for-9 from medium danger on 1.05 expected goals — 1.9 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SEA
3 G · 2.39 xG · +0.6
VGK
2 G · 3.56 xG · -1.6
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. DaccordSEA
+1.6
A. SchmidVGK
-0.6

SEA finished +0.6 against expected, VGK -1.6 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 1.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SEA
WRIST1/18
SLAP0/5
SNAP1/7
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND1/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/11
VGK
WRIST2/21
SLAP0/9
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/2
OTHER0/17
SEA
VGK
Off the rush
1 G on 21 · 1.75 xG
2 G on 26 · 2.43 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 3 · 0.34 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.64 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 1-for-18, VGK 2-for-21. VGK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Eichel
#9 · C · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 21:59 TOI · +1
C. Stephenson
#9 · C · SEA
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 18:01 TOI
A. Larsson
#6 · D · SEA
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:13 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • SEA stole this one. VGK owned 60% of the xG and lost.
  • J. Daccord (SEA) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
  • VGK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • VGK created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • SEA created 3 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • VGK underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Daccord (SEA) saved 1.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · SEA at VGK · 10:00 PM ET

The Golden Knights are the model's lean over the Kraken — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 3:36 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

59%
VGK
Model favorite
41%
59%
SEA50VGK

VGK by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score SEA 2.12.6 VGK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

SEA← edge
edge →VGK
46.0%5v5 xG%54.0%
45.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.13xGF / 602.52
2.51xGA / 602.11
1.87Goals for / gm2.12
1.95Goals against / gm2.10
1.011PDO — luck, not skill0.983

VGK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.011 vs 0.983) says SEA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Vegas carries 59% win probability in the model's projection—a projection built on territorial dominance. The Golden Knights control at 5v5: 54.0% expected goals against Seattle's 46.0%, and their 52.0% Corsi edge dictates pace. The model projects a 2.6–2.1 expected-goals game favoring Vegas.

Seattle's PDO sits at 1.011, a sign of goal-luck running hot. Vegas at 0.983 is the opposite—running cold, due for positive regression. Both A. Hill and J. Daccord are on back-to-backs; watch for tired starters or bench rotations.

Shane Wright is Seattle's engine: 0.77 expected goals per 60, 8 goals, 4 hard-deadline chances at 10.4% shooting. Berkly Catton (0.68 xG/60, 6 goals) adds secondary offensive depth. Vegas counters with Tomas Hertl—0.88 xG/60, 5 goals—and possibly Brandon Saad, marked inactive. Saad carries 0.91 xG/60 but has only 3 goals.

Seattle records zero hard-deadline goals and zero rebound goals. Vegas mirrors that zero rate. Seattle's defensive liability is Chandler Stephenson. Vegas's is Rasmus Andersson.

The model's edge is structural. Vegas controls possession, drives shot attempts, and benefits from regression. That's why the model leans Vegas.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters