Backcheck
Recap · VGK at ANA

Ducks steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

The Ducks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.17–2.48 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:40 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
VGK
Vegas Golden Knights
3
Home
ANA
Anaheim Ducks
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.17Expected goals2.48
63% share for the better side
31Shot attempts (SOG)23
9High-danger chances2
62Corsi (all attempts)50
Score-adjusted: 61% / 40%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Anaheim won 4-3 despite losing the expected goals battle decisively. Vegas held 4.17 xG to the Ducks' 2.48—a 63-37 split that makes the final score an outlier rather than a result.

The numbers explain why. The Golden Knights generated better looks per shot (0.067 xG/shot vs. 0.050) and led high-danger chances 9 to 2. But L. Dostal overperformed his expected goals by 1.17 while A. Hill underperformed by 0.52, a swing that tilted the outcome despite Vegas's dominance.

Anaheim's rush attack provided the escape route. The Ducks scored three times on 23 rush chances; Vegas converted twice on 25. The Golden Knights crashed harder for rebounds—five opportunities created, one converted—but couldn't overcome the goaltending variance.

Tomas Hertl's snap shot from the slot at 19:54 of the third marked the inflection point.

The standout performers embodied this efficiency. J. Trouba recorded two assists in 25:13; M. Stone matched that in 23:29. R. Poehling added a goal and an assist in 15:44, a punch-above-weight contribution to a theft.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VGK2 / 9 · 2.12 xG
ANA2 / 2 · 0.76 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VGK1 / 13 · 1.45 xG
ANA2 / 9 · 1.03 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VGK0 / 40 · 0.59 xG
ANA0 / 39 · 0.70 xG

ANA went 2-for-2 from high danger on 0.76 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VGK
3 G · 4.17 xG · -1.2
ANA
4 G · 2.48 xG · +1.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. HillVGK
-0.5
L. DostalANA
+1.2

VGK finished -1.2 against expected, ANA +1.5 — L. Dostal (ANA) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VGK
SNAP3/24
WRIST0/5
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/17
ANA
SNAP1/21
WRIST1/10
SLAP0/5
TIP IN1/2
BACKHAND0/0
DEFLECTED1/1
BAT0/0
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/11
VGK
ANA
Off the rush
2 G on 25 · 2.62 xG
3 G on 23 · 1.26 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 1.05 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.08 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: VGK went 3-for-24, ANA 1-for-21. ANA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Trouba
#65 · D · ANA
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 25:13 TOI
M. Stone
#61 · R · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 23:29 TOI
R. Poehling
#25 · C · ANA
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 15:44 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • ANA won despite being outplayed by xG (37%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • L. Dostal (ANA) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • VGK had the higher quality looks — 0.067 xG/shot vs 0.050.
  • ANA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • VGK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • VGK created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • ANA outperformed their expected goals by 1.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · VGK at ANA · 9:30 PM ET

Golden Knights at Ducks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 4:03 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
ANA
Model favorite
50%
50%
VGK50ANA

ANA by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score VGK 2.52.6 ANA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

VGK← edge
edge →ANA
54.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
52.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.52xGF / 602.80
2.11xGA / 602.59
2.12Goals for / gm2.09
2.10Goals against / gm2.32
0.983PDO — luck, not skill0.981

VGK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.983 vs 0.981) says VGK has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models couldn't be closer: the Golden Knights are projected between 2.5 and 2.6 goals, and the Ducks land at 50% win probability. This is a literal coin flip.

The 5v5 picture shows two evenly matched teams. Vegas edges Anaheim in shot quality—54.0% expected goals to 52.0%—and both teams sit at exactly 52.0% in Corsi. Both clubs are running cold on their PDO markers: Vegas at 0.983, Anaheim at 0.981. That's meaningful regression upside for either team, assuming their underlying play doesn't deteriorate.

Vegas's offensive punch runs through Brandon Saad and Tomas Hertl. Saad is generating 0.91 expected goals per 60 minutes with 3 goals and 6 assists, converting at 4.1%—below his underlying shot quality. He's scored one high-danger goal. Hertl generates 0.88 xG/60 with 5 goals and 17 assists, also underperforming his 4.3% shooting rate. He's also notched one high-danger goal.

Anaheim counters with Beckett Sennecke and Cutter Gauthier. Sennecke leads in expected goals generation at 1.03 xG/60, backed by 20 goals and 19 assists with a 13.5% shooting percentage—well above expected. He's scored 8 high-danger goals. Gauthier is nearly as productive at 0.99 xG/60 with 25 goals and 16 assists, shooting 12.9%, but has converted only 2 high-danger chances.

Vegas's defensive weak point is Rasmus Andersson. Anaheim's is Mason McTavish. Whichever team better exploits its opponent's liability—through sustained pressure rather than isolated chances—likely escapes with a win.

The stats say this game could go either way. The setup suggests the winner will be the team that first converts its close chances.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
ANA
Beckett Sennecke20G 19A
1.03 xG/60 · 8 HD · 13.5% sh
Cutter Gauthier25G 16A
0.99 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters