Backcheck
Recap · WSH at PHI

Flyers hold off the Capitals

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:50 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
2
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.95Expected goals4.14
58% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)22
4High-danger chances7
64Corsi (all attempts)48
Score-adjusted: 60% / 40%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Philadelphia's 4-2 win over Washington masked a sizable control advantage. The Flyers held 58% of expected goals at 5v5 (4.14–2.95), with shots split 22-28 in Washington's favor—a gap that reflected quality over volume. Philadelphia generated looks at 0.086 xG per shot while the Capitals managed 0.046.

Washington's looks were higher-quality than their shot total suggested, yet the team underperformed its expected goals by 0.95. C. Stevenson (0.857 SV%) couldn't overcome the deficit. D. Vladar (26 of 28, 0.929 SV%) didn't need to work as hard.

Philadelphia converted efficiently. The Flyers scored twice from low-danger areas—opportunities the opposing goalie is expected to deny. They held the high-danger advantage 7–4 and capitalized on two of 19 rush chances. R. Ristolainen's wrist shot from the high slot at 19:43 of the third set the tone. Washington had decent looks but lacked the conversion rate to stay competitive.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH1 / 4 · 0.99 xG
PHI1 / 7 · 1.91 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH1 / 11 · 1.35 xG
PHI1 / 16 · 1.93 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH0 / 49 · 0.61 xG
PHI2 / 25 · 0.30 xG

PHI went 2-for-25 from low danger on 0.30 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
2 G · 2.95 xG · -0.9
PHI
4 G · 4.14 xG · -0.1
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
C. StevensonWSH
+1.1
D. VladarPHI
+1.0

WSH finished -0.9 against expected, PHI -0.1 — C. Stevenson (WSH) saved 1.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST1/21
SNAP1/8
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/25
PHI
WRIST2/15
SNAP0/10
SLAP1/4
BACKHAND1/3
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/12
WSH
PHI
Off the rush
1 G on 23 · 1.80 xG
2 G on 19 · 2.32 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 1 · 0.21 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.51 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 1-for-21, PHI 2-for-15. PHI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Ristolainen
#55 · D · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 20:41 TOI · +2
T. Konecny
#11 · R · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 19:39 TOI · +1
A. Beauvillier
#72 · R · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:51 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WSH generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • C. Stevenson (WSH) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
  • PHI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.086 xG/shot vs 0.046. Quality over quantity.
  • PHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
  • PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

Capitals at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 3:49 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
PHI
Model favorite
47%
53%
WSH50PHI

PHI by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score WSH 2.42.6 PHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →PHI
50.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.62xGF / 602.26
2.62xGA / 602.20
2.18Goals for / gm1.96
1.79Goals against / gm1.82
1.018PDO — luck, not skill1.008

WSH holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 1.008) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Models project a 2.4-2.6 game with the Flyers favored at 53% win probability — this is a genuine coin flip.

Both teams are struggling. The Flyers sit at -15 goal differential over their last 10 games; the Capitals are at -8.

On the season, the underlying metrics look comparable. Washington owns 50.0% expected goals share at 5-on-5 with a 49.0% Corsi rating. Philadelphia counters at 51.0% xG% and 48.0% Corsi%. Their PDOs tell a different story — Washington at 1.018, Philadelphia at 1.008 — suggesting the Capitals are running hot and should expect regression.

Washington's attack runs through Alex Ovechkin (0.97 xG/60, 19G 17A, 13.8% shooting, 2 high-danger goals) and Anthony Beauvillier (0.89 xG/60, 14G 9A, 10.4% shooting, 2 HD goals). Philadelphia counters with Owen Tippett (0.88 xG/60, 19G 18A, 12.1% shooting, 2 HD goals) and Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12G 21A, 11.2% shooting, 3 HD goals).

Washington's defensive weak link is Declan Chisholm; Philadelphia's is Christian Dvorak. Neither team has converted high-danger or rebound chances — both sit at 0% on these metrics.

The matchup hinges on star power and recent trajectory. Washington has the elite scorer but recent form concerns. Philadelphia has the underlying advantage in shot quality but has bled goals. At coin-flip odds, that uncertainty appropriately captures the fundamental tension.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters