Backcheck
Recap · NYI at NJD

I. Sorokin stands tall as the Islanders edge the Devils

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.15–3.91 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 4:16 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.15Expected goals3.91
55% share for the better side
14Shot attempts (SOG)24
5High-danger chances9
46Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders' 3-1 win was a highway robbery. New Jersey controlled 55% of expected goals at 5-on-5 but lost anyway—the Devils' shot volume and chance quality meant nothing against I. Sorokin's wall.

The Devils dictated play by every traditional measure: 63% of shot attempts (24–14 on goal) and 9–5 in high-danger chances. But conversion and goaltending told a different story. New Jersey went 0 for 9 on high-danger attempts, an invisible performance when you need to execute. The Islanders were clinical: 3 for 5 in the same situations (60%), turning their limited opportunities into goals.

I. Sorokin made 23 of 24 saves and finished +2.91 goals above expected. J. Allen was +1.15 vs expected, stopping the puck 11 times from 13 attempts. Sorokin's superiority was the story.

Mathew Barzal's wrist shot from the point in the third period (19:36) punctuated the Islanders' efficiency—a goal that materialized when New Jersey's high-danger attempts did not. The Devils underperformed their xG by 2.91 goals, a reflection of missed opportunities and a goaltender who refused to bend.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI3 / 5 · 1.64 xG
NJD0 / 9 · 2.57 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI0 / 10 · 1.12 xG
NJD1 / 9 · 0.82 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 31 · 0.38 xG
NJD0 / 33 · 0.52 xG

NJD went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.57 expected goals — 2.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 3.15 xG · -0.1
NJD
1 G · 3.91 xG · -2.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+2.9
J. AllenNJD
+1.1

NYI finished -0.1 against expected, NJD -2.9 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST2/14
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND1/4
SNAP0/3
TIP IN0/4
OTHER0/18
NJD
WRIST1/22
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/4
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/2
OTHER0/12
NYI
NJD
Off the rush
0 G on 18 · 1.65 xG
1 G on 27 · 2.95 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.44 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.73 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 2-for-14, NJD 1-for-22.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Horvat
#14 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:50 TOI · +1
N. Hischier
#13 · C · NJD
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 20:02 TOI · -1
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 18:44 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI stole this one. NJD owned 55% of the xG and lost.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 2.9 goals above expected.
  • NJD couldn't convert — 0/9 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NYI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/5 on HD chances (60%).
  • NJD created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NJD underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • I. Sorokin was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 9 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at NJD · 7:00 PM ET

Islanders at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 4:28 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
NJD
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYI50NJD

NJD by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.52.7 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →NJD
48.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
49.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.48xGF / 602.45
2.69xGA / 602.50
1.78Goals for / gm1.66
1.94Goals against / gm2.23
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.971

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.971) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.7 goal game with New Jersey favored at 54% win probability — roughly a coin flip, with the Devils holding a marginal edge.

New Jersey enters underwater: a -7 goal differential over the last 10 games suggests uneven execution despite underlying strength. The Devils' season-long shot metrics support this. They lead in expected goals percentage (50.0% to 48.0%) and shot attempts (51.0% Corsi to 49.0%), yet their PDO sits at 0.971 — running cold on puck luck. New York's PDO is 0.993, meaning the Islanders are converting closer to expectation. That gap should compress; regression favors New Jersey.

Both teams navigate back-to-back games. J. Markstrom and I. Sorokin both face potential rest or second-night starts, a variable worth monitoring.

Players to Watch

NYI

  • Anders Lee — 1.20 xG/60, 9G 20A, 2 high-danger goals, 6.4% shooting
  • Bo Horvat — 0.87 xG/60, 18G 10A, 3 high-danger goals, 12.8% shooting

NJD

  • Timo Meier — 1.08 xG/60, 13G 15A, 3 high-danger goals, 6.7% shooting
  • Jack Hughes — 0.88 xG/60, 18G 17A, 1 high-danger goal, 11.5% shooting

Anders Lee's shot volume (1.20 xG/60) and elevated shooting percentage (6.4%) mark him as New York's most dangerous threat. Bo Horvat's 12.8% shooting rate suggests sustainability at 18 goals. For New Jersey, Timo Meier's 1.08 xG/60 makes him the volume driver, while Jack Hughes' 11.5% shooting underscores his finishing touch at 18 goals.

The marginal edge belongs to New Jersey's forward depth. Alexander Romanov represents a defensive liability for New York; Johnathan Kovacevic serves the same role for New Jersey. High-danger and rebound scoring have stalled for both teams — each at 0% in both categories — creating opportunity for whoever breaks through first.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters