Red Wings steal one from the Senators against the run of play
The Red Wings stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.26–3.84 and won anyway.
The underlying story
Detroit stole this one. Ottawa controlled 63% of expected goals at 5v5 and still lost 2–1 in overtime—a rout on paper that the Red Wings refused to accept.
The Senators dominated the volume: 57% of shot attempts (27–20 on goal), 63–37% split in xG (3.84–2.26). But Ottawa's quality was wasted. The Senators generated 7 high-danger chances to Detroit's 0, yet converted none. That 0/7 finish won't happen often.
J. Gibson (DET) was the difference. He saved 2.8 goals above expected, posting a 0.963 SV% and stopping all 7 high-danger shots. L. Ullmark (OTT) finished at 0.900 SV%, and the gap between those two numbers—less than 7 percentage points—contained the entire game.
Ottawa didn't lack for opportunity. They created 5 rebound chances (0 converted) and generated far more dangerous looks per shot (0.058 xG/shot vs Detroit's 0.038). The Senators underperformed their xG by 2.84 goals—a crushing miss that spoke to execution more than luck.
The turning point: Dylan Larkin's backhander from the slot at 01:50 of overtime. Not a rebound, not a defensive breakdown, but a clean shot that ended it. Fitting for a game Detroit had no right to win.
The danger ladder
OTT went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.96 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
DET finished -0.3 against expected, OTT -2.8 — J. Gibson (DET) saved 2.8 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: DET went 0-for-18, OTT 1-for-21.
- DET stole this one. OTT owned 63% of the xG and lost.
- J. Gibson (DET) stopped 2.8 goals above expected.
- OTT generated far more dangerous chances — 0.058 xG/shot vs 0.038. Quality over quantity.
- OTT couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- OTT created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- DET created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- OTT underperformed xG by 2.8 — wasted quality chances.
- J. Gibson (DET) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
- J. Gibson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.