Backcheck
Recap · NSH at DAL

Stars run the Predators off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 5:02 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
2
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.32Expected goals3.60
61% share for the better side
27Shot attempts (SOG)25
2High-danger chances9
48Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville out-shot Dallas 27–25 but had no business winning—the Stars dominated 5v5 expected goals 3.60–2.32, a 61–39 split reflecting a quality gap no volume advantage erases. High-danger chances made it lopsided: 9–2 favoring Dallas.

J. Saros kept Nashville competitive. He stopped 22 of 25 shots for a 0.880 save percentage, performing 0.60 points better than expected, but volume alone couldn't overcome efficiency.

Dallas executed when it mattered. J. Oettinger recorded 25 saves on 27 shots (0.926 SV%). Jason Robertson ended it at 01:47 of overtime with a snap shot from the doorstep.

Nashville generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests, fueled by rush offense. They converted 2 goals on 20 rush chances, a lethal finishing rate that should have been dangerous. They created 4 rebound opportunities and converted zero, crashing the net without payoff.

W. Johnston contributed 1 goal and 1 assist in 21:44. L. Evangelista recorded 2 assists in 17:20. Robertson finished with 1 goal and 1 assist in 23:05.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH0 / 2 · 0.66 xG
DAL2 / 9 · 2.18 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH2 / 12 · 1.14 xG
DAL1 / 8 · 0.83 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH0 / 34 · 0.52 xG
DAL0 / 41 · 0.60 xG

NSH went 2-for-12 from medium danger on 1.14 expected goals — 0.9 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
2 G · 2.32 xG · -0.3
DAL
3 G · 3.60 xG · -0.6
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. SarosNSH
+0.6
J. OettingerDAL
+0.3

NSH finished -0.3 against expected, DAL -0.6 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 0.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
SNAP2/24
SLAP0/5
WRIST0/1
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/0
POKE0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/13
DAL
SNAP2/27
SLAP0/2
WRIST1/5
BACKHAND0/2
TIP IN0/4
POKE0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/18
NSH
DAL
Off the rush
2 G on 20 · 1.34 xG
1 G on 27 · 2.60 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.78 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.39 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NSH went 2-for-24, DAL 2-for-27. NSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Robertson
#21 · L · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 23:05 TOI · +1
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 21:44 TOI · +1
L. Evangelista
#77 · R · NSH
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 17:20 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NSH generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • NSH created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Predators at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 5:26 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
DAL
Model favorite
46%
54%
NSH50DAL

DAL by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NSH 2.42.6 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →DAL
49.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
50.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.48xGF / 602.36
2.58xGA / 602.29
1.84Goals for / gm2.07
2.21Goals against / gm1.68
0.992PDO — luck, not skill1.024

DAL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.992 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Models project a 2.4-2.6 final with Dallas at 54% win probability—effectively a pick'em. The Stars enter as the hotter team, posting 8-2-0 over their last 10 games, but the underlying metrics tell a different story.

Nashville dominates possession at 50.0% Corsi% yet trails 49.0% to 51.0% in expected goals—Dallas generates cleaner shot quality. The Stars run hot at 1.024 PDO while Nashville sits 0.992. This is Dallas getting lucky; expect regression.

J. Annunen takes the back-to-back; watch whether Nashville goes fresh in net or leans on a tired starter. That goaltending decision could tilt the entire game.

The matchup hinges on possession versus efficiency. If Nashville pins Dallas deep, the Predators generate chances. If Dallas converts higher-quality looks even on neutral ice, the Stars win.

Players to Watch

Nashville: Zachary L'Heureux has posted 4 goals at 0.85 xG/60 and a 16.0% shooting clip. Filip Forsberg adds 23 goals, 17 assists, 0.80 xG/60, and 13.6% shooting.

Dallas: Jason Robertson leads with 25 goals, 21 assists, 0.96 xG/60, and 12.4% shooting. Michael Bunting contributes 8 goals, 14 assists, 0.83 xG/60, and 7.6% shooting.

Dallas must contain L'Heureux's output despite modest assist totals. Nashville must neutralize Robertson, whose shot volume and accuracy define Dallas's ceiling. Neither team generates material scoring from high-danger chances or rebounds, which simplifies the calculus—the team winning the underlying battle likely wins.

Jonathan Marchessault represents Nashville's defensive weak link; Tyler Myers does the same for Dallas. This is close enough that any shift in goaltending, injury, or lineup move becomes pivotal. Dallas's hot streak and superior expected goals share give them an edge, but Nashville's territorial control is real enough to steal this one.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters