Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at NYR

Blue Jackets steal one from the Rangers against the run of play

The Blue Jackets stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.63–3.80 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 5:52 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
5
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.63Expected goals3.80
59% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)33
4High-danger chances11
51Corsi (all attempts)67
Score-adjusted: 38% / 62%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus stole this one. New York built a 59–41 edge in expected goals, controlled 53% of shot attempts, and landed 11 high-danger chances against Columbus's four. The Rangers created the better looks. The Blue Jackets won 5–4 in overtime anyway.

The metric most at odds with the scoreboard is xG. New York's 3.80 to Columbus's 2.63 should have sunk a weaker goaltender. Instead, I. Shesterkin surrendered 2.37 goals above expectation. E. Merzlikins stopped 29 of 33.

The turning point came at 1:04 of overtime: K. Marchenko's snap shot from the high slot. Finish separated these teams. Columbus converted five of 25 rush chances; New York got two.

Columbus overperformed their xG by 2.37 goals—either elite execution or lucky bounces, probably both. The Rangers controlled the game architecturally: maintained possession, generated high-quality chances, played in control. Yet they left without a point. That's the cost of dominance that doesn't convert; you can control the process and still lose.

K. Marchenko led the way (2G, 1A in 18:04). G. Perreault kept New York competitive (2G, 1A in 17:18). D. Severson steadied the Blue Jackets' back end (2A in 21:59).

The Rangers controlled the game. The Blue Jackets controlled the scoreboard.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ0 / 4 · 0.97 xG
NYR3 / 11 · 2.37 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ4 / 10 · 0.95 xG
NYR0 / 8 · 0.75 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ1 / 37 · 0.71 xG
NYR1 / 48 · 0.68 xG

CBJ went 4-for-10 from medium danger on 0.95 expected goals — 3.0 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
5 G · 2.63 xG · +2.4
NYR
4 G · 3.80 xG · +0.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
E. MerzlikinsCBJ
-0.2
I. ShesterkinNYR
-2.4

CBJ finished +2.4 against expected, NYR +0.2 — I. Shesterkin (NYR) allowed 2.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST0/13
SNAP3/12
TIP IN1/6
SLAP1/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BACKHAND0/2
OTHER0/13
NYR
WRIST4/29
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/2
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/22
CBJ
NYR
Off the rush
5 G on 25 · 1.82 xG
2 G on 25 · 1.74 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.33 xG
1 G on 6 · 1.31 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 0-for-13, NYR 4-for-29. CBJ scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 18:04 TOI
G. Perreault
#94 · R · NYR
2 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 17:18 TOI · +1
D. Severson
#78 · D · CBJ
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 21:59 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CBJ stole this one. NYR owned 59% of the xG and lost.
  • I. Shesterkin (NYR) gave up 2.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (NYR 11, CBJ 4).
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • NYR created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ outperformed their expected goals by 2.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 5:08 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
CBJ
Model favorite
51%
49%
CBJ50NYR

CBJ by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.52.5 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →NYR
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
51.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.63xGF / 602.26
2.43xGA / 602.40
2.12Goals for / gm1.88
1.98Goals against / gm1.90
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.009

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5-2.5 game with the Blue Jackets at 51% win probability—this is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The Blue Jackets have the form advantage. They're 7-2-1 in their last 10, the hotter recent pace. The Rangers, meanwhile, are -11 goal differential in that same stretch—they're leaking chances.

The Blue Jackets also own the underlying play. At 5v5, they're at 52.0% expected goals and 51.0% Corsi; the Rangers sit at 48.0% and 49.0%. Those aren't enormous gaps, but they're consistent. The Rangers' 1.009 PDO over the season suggests some regression is coming, while the Blue Jackets' 1.003 keeps them closer to true talent. The Blue Jackets' weak defensive link is Conor Garland; the Rangers have Vincent Iorio as a liability.

The shot quality angle matters here. Boone Jenner generates 0.98 xG per 60 on a 9.6% shot rate—unusually low for his 11G, 21A pace, which suggests upside if luck normalizes. Mathieu Olivier adds 0.89 xG/60 with a 13.3% clip, giving the Blue Jackets two avenues to score. Olivier's 12 goals on heavier volume is the real threat; Jenner's 21 assists suggest he's threading plays, not just shooting.

For the Rangers, Adam Sykora is running hot at 20.0% shooting on 0.91 xG/60—that's unsustainable and masks a shallower underlying advantage than his three goals indicate. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8G, 11A) is the steadier contributor. Neither team scores much from high-danger chances (both at 0% HD goal rate) or off rebounds (0% for both), which flattens the offensive ceiling on both sides.

The Blue Jackets project to control the game and should be favored. But 51% is the fair number for a team with a modest underlying edge and only a recent-form cushion to show for it. The Rangers aren't without recourse—their PDO advantage, while small, is real, and Sykora's heater could hold. That's why this plays as a coin flip, not a Blue Jackets lean.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters