Devils run the Panthers off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Panthers underperformed their 2.50 expected goals by 1.50 in a 5-1 loss to New Jersey. They generated higher-quality chances than their 21 shots suggest, but failed to convert, while New Jersey controlled play decisively: 69% of expected goals and 7-2 in high-danger chances. The difference in shot quality was stark—the Devils created looks at 0.102 xG per shot versus Florida's 0.058.
Execution was the story. New Jersey scored 3 times on 27 rush chances while Florida couldn't capitalize on opportunities. Goaltending quality went both ways. S. Bobrovsky saved 2.62 shots above expected and J. Markstrom saved 1.50 above expected, but Florida's inefficiency outweighed any edge.
The danger ladder
NJD went 2-for-7 from high danger on 3.40 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
FLA finished -1.5 against expected, NJD -0.6 — S. Bobrovsky (FLA) saved 2.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: FLA went 0-for-15, NJD 3-for-27. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- FLA generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- S. Bobrovsky (FLA) stopped 2.6 goals above expected.
- NJD generated far more dangerous chances — 0.102 xG/shot vs 0.058. Quality over quantity.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 27 rush chances.
- FLA created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- FLA underperformed xG by 1.5 — wasted quality chances.
- S. Bobrovsky (FLA) saved 2.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 1.5 goals above expected — stole the show.