Backcheck
Recap · NYI at TOR

Islanders hold off the Maple Leafs

The Islanders earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:35 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
TOR
Toronto Maple Leafs
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.20Expected goals3.35
56% share for the better side
34Shot attempts (SOG)27
5High-danger chances7
67Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 50% / 50%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Toronto had more high-danger chances (7-5) but scored zero on them and lost 3-1. The difference was I. Sorokin, who stopped 2.4 goals above expected and saved all 7 high-danger shots he faced. Exceptional goaltending decided the game.

The broader structure still favored the Islanders. They controlled 56% of 5v5 expected goals (4.20–3.35) and out-attempted the Leafs 34–27. New York's power play was dominant—2 goals on 15 shots (1.23 xG). But none of that mattered as much as Sorokin's night. The Leafs created quality chances; they simply could not bury them.

J. Woll played well for Toronto. He made 31 of 34 saves (0.912 SV%) and exceeded his expected performance by 1.20 goals. That would win most nights. Not this one.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI1 / 5 · 1.20 xG
TOR0 / 7 · 1.76 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI2 / 24 · 2.41 xG
TOR1 / 9 · 0.96 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 38 · 0.59 xG
TOR0 / 35 · 0.63 xG

TOR went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.76 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 4.20 xG · -1.2
TOR
1 G · 3.35 xG · -2.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+2.4
J. WollTOR
+1.2

NYI finished -1.2 against expected, TOR -2.4 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST2/27
SNAP0/6
TIP IN0/11
SLAP1/5
BACKHAND0/3
POKE0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/14
TOR
WRIST1/18
SNAP0/14
TIP IN0/1
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/2
POKE0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/8
NYI
TOR
Off the rush
1 G on 36 · 2.89 xG
1 G on 24 · 2.07 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.50 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.89 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 2-for-27, TOR 1-for-18.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
0 G · 3 A · 1 SOG · 18:31 TOI · +1
C. Ritchie
#64 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 15:06 TOI · -1
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:57 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 2.4 goals above expected.
  • TOR couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • TOR created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • TOR underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • I. Sorokin was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
  • NYI power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 15 PP shots (1.23 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at TOR · 7:00 PM ET

Islanders at Maple Leafs: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:44 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
TOR
Model favorite
50%
50%
NYI50TOR

TOR by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYI 2.62.6 TOR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →TOR
48.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
49.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.48xGF / 602.24
2.69xGA / 602.67
1.78Goals for / gm2.09
1.94Goals against / gm2.52
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.002

NYI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.002) says TOR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The projection model calls this a dead heat: 2.6 goals for each side, with the Maple Leafs at exactly 50% win probability.

The Islanders arrive hotter, at 7-3-0 over their last 10. Toronto is underwater at -15 goal differential through the same stretch.

At 5v5, the Islanders hold a 48.0% expected-goals share to Toronto's 46.0%, and dominate territorial play at 49.0% Corsi to 45.0%. The Leafs' puck luck is keeping them afloat: their season PDO sits at 1.002 compared to the Islanders' 0.993, meaning Toronto's scoring at a sustainable advantage despite driving fewer chances.

The Islanders center their attack around Anders Lee and Bo Horvat. Lee generates 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes with 9 goals and 20 assists, though his 6.4% shooting rate suggests regression; his 2 high-danger goals show he finds premium ice. Horvat carries 18 goals at 12.8% shooting, though his 0.87 xG/60 means he's converting at an unsustainable rate; he's also posted 3 high-danger goals.

Toronto counters with Auston Matthews at 1.10 xG/60, carrying 17 goals and 13 assists on a 10.6% shot rate with 1 high-danger goal. John Tavares runs 0.91 xG/60 with 15 goals and 24 assists, also with 3 high-danger goals.

Both teams sit at 0% on high-danger and rebound goals—suggesting cautious play in dangerous areas. The Islanders' defensive weak link is Alexander Romanov; Toronto's is Bo Groulx. Neither has built margin elsewhere, so execution on the chances that matter decides this.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
TOR
Auston Matthews17G 13A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.6% sh
John Tavares15G 24A
0.91 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters