Backcheck
Recap · CAR at CBJ

Blue Jackets pull away from the Hurricanes

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:48 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CAR
Carolina Hurricanes
1
Home
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.49Expected goals3.27
57% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)30
2High-danger chances4
63Corsi (all attempts)61
Score-adjusted: 57% / 43%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus' 5-1 scoreline masks a narrower underlying battle. Expected goals finished 3.27-2.49 in the Blue Jackets' favor—a 57-43 split that would normally forecast a 3-1 or 4-2 result. But elite finishes on one side and defensive entropy on the other created the gap.

J. Greaves' 0.966 save percentage carried the larger load, stopping 1.49 goals above expectation while facing 29 shot attempts. B. Bussi conceded 1.73 more than expected, unable to stem high-quality chances.

Columbus' shot profile was sharper: 0.054 xG per attempt versus Carolina's 0.040. On 30 attempts, that compounds. The Blue Jackets were clinical in high-danger territory (2/4, 50%) and lethal off the rush (4 goals on 27 chances). They added two power-play goals on ten shots—an outright domination.

Mathieu Olivier's wrist shot from the doorstep (P3, 07:38) crystallized the game's arc early in the third, pushing the advantage beyond recovery.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CAR1 / 2 · 0.50 xG
CBJ2 / 4 · 1.07 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CAR0 / 13 · 1.46 xG
CBJ1 / 17 · 1.70 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CAR0 / 48 · 0.53 xG
CBJ2 / 40 · 0.51 xG

CBJ went 2-for-40 from low danger on 0.51 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CAR
1 G · 2.49 xG · -1.5
CBJ
5 G · 3.27 xG · +1.7
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
B. BussiCAR
-1.7
J. GreavesCBJ
+1.5

CAR finished -1.5 against expected, CBJ +1.7 — B. Bussi (CAR) allowed 1.7 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CAR
WRIST0/16
SNAP0/6
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND1/7
OTHER0/24
CBJ
WRIST4/17
SNAP1/10
SLAP0/8
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/19
CAR
CBJ
Off the rush
1 G on 23 · 1.70 xG
4 G on 27 · 2.75 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.19 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.13 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CAR went 0-for-16, CBJ 4-for-17. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Coyle
#3 · C · CBJ
1 G · 3 A · 4 SOG · 18:31 TOI · +2
A. Fantilli
#19 · C · CBJ
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:34 TOI · -1
C. Sillinger
#4 · C · CBJ
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:07 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
  • B. Bussi (CAR) gave up 1.7 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • CBJ generated far more dangerous chances — 0.054 xG/shot vs 0.040. Quality over quantity.
  • CBJ was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • CBJ scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • CBJ outperformed their expected goals by 1.7 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • CBJ power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 10 PP shots (0.60 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CAR at CBJ · 7:00 PM ET

Hurricanes at Blue Jackets: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:33 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
CAR
Model favorite
52%
48%
CAR50CBJ

CAR by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CAR 2.72.6 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CAR← edge
edge →CBJ
56.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
60.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.98xGF / 602.63
2.31xGA / 602.43
2.26Goals for / gm2.12
1.95Goals against / gm1.98
0.984PDO — luck, not skill1.003

CAR holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.984 vs 1.003) says CBJ has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The projection gives Carolina 52% win probability in a 2.7-2.6 game — as close to even money as you'll find.

Carolina dominates underlying play. The Hurricanes generate 56.0% expected goals to Columbus' 52.0%, and control territory at 60.0% Corsi versus 51.0%. This is a meaningful possession edge that should yield first-period control and extended stretches in the Blue Jackets' end.

But Columbus carries a structural edge that can't be ignored. Its 1.003 PDO suggests above-average puck luck embedded in results; Carolina's 0.984 sits cold, pointing toward positive regression. This is the central tension: Carolina plays better hockey, but Columbus finishes better.

Jackson Blake drives Carolina's attack: 1.06 xG/60, 14G 19A, 2 HD goals at 10.9% shooting. He'll draw constant checking, leaving space for Seth Jarvis. Jarvis operates as the secondary threat — 0.98 xG/60, 17G 12A, 1 HD goals at 11.9% shooting.

Boone Jenner mirrors Jarvis' xG/60 (0.98) but plays setup artist for Columbus: 11G 21A with 2 HD goals and 9.6% shooting. Mathieu Olivier is the variance play — 0.89 xG/60, 12G 9A at 13.3% shooting, enough conversion to swing a low-event game on a clean transition.

Both teams are structure-first systems: 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound rate across the board. Charles Alexis Legault represents Carolina's defensive liability; Conor Garland anchors a similar weak point for Columbus. Expect tightly managed minutes and the game decided by one team's ability to capitalize when chaos does emerge.

The model says pick'em. The advanced metrics say Carolina. The results say Columbus deserves to believe. Until the gap closes, this is a genuine coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CAR
Jackson Blake14G 19A
1.06 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.9% sh
Seth Jarvis17G 12A
0.98 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.9% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters