Predators steal one from the Jets against the run of play
The Predators stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.55–5.07 and won anyway.
The underlying story
Nashville won a game it didn't deserve to win. Winnipeg commanded 66% of expected goals, but lost in a shootout anyway.
J. Saros stole this one. The Predators goaltender made 36 of 39 saves—a 0.923 save percentage—and outperformed his expected save rate by 2.07 goals, the sort of performance that turns an xG blowout into a theft.
The Jets generated the chances. Winnipeg owned 63% of shot attempts (39 on goal to Nashville's 23) and a 9–2 edge in high-danger chances. Their power play scored twice on 18 shots, generating 1.41 expected goals. They crashed the net relentlessly, creating 11 rebound opportunities. Yet Winnipeg underperformed its xG by 2.07 goals, wasting the quality they'd earned.
Nashville's efficiency did the damage. The Predators converted 3 goals on 29 rush chances. C. Hellebuyck (20 saves, 0.870 SV%) played reasonably, but the barrage of expected goals should have overwhelmed him.
The danger ladder
NSH went 3-for-13 from medium danger on 1.49 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
NSH finished +1.4 against expected, WPG -2.1 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 0-for-15, WPG 2-for-31. NSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- NSH stole this one. WPG owned 66% of the xG and lost.
- J. Saros (NSH) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
- WPG generated far more dangerous chances — 0.067 xG/shot vs 0.050. Quality over quantity.
- NSH was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 29 rush chances.
- WPG created 11 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- WPG underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
- J. Saros (NSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
- WPG power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 18 PP shots (1.41 xG).