Backcheck
Recap · NSH at WPG

Predators steal one from the Jets against the run of play

The Predators stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.55–5.07 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:36 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
4
Home
WPG
Winnipeg Jets
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.55Expected goals5.07
67% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)39
2High-danger chances9
51Corsi (all attempts)76
Score-adjusted: 40% / 60%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville won a game it didn't deserve to win. Winnipeg commanded 66% of expected goals, but lost in a shootout anyway.

J. Saros stole this one. The Predators goaltender made 36 of 39 saves—a 0.923 save percentage—and outperformed his expected save rate by 2.07 goals, the sort of performance that turns an xG blowout into a theft.

The Jets generated the chances. Winnipeg owned 63% of shot attempts (39 on goal to Nashville's 23) and a 9–2 edge in high-danger chances. Their power play scored twice on 18 shots, generating 1.41 expected goals. They crashed the net relentlessly, creating 11 rebound opportunities. Yet Winnipeg underperformed its xG by 2.07 goals, wasting the quality they'd earned.

Nashville's efficiency did the damage. The Predators converted 3 goals on 29 rush chances. C. Hellebuyck (20 saves, 0.870 SV%) played reasonably, but the barrage of expected goals should have overwhelmed him.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH0 / 2 · 0.40 xG
WPG1 / 9 · 2.03 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH3 / 13 · 1.49 xG
WPG2 / 19 · 2.08 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH0 / 36 · 0.67 xG
WPG0 / 48 · 0.97 xG

NSH went 3-for-13 from medium danger on 1.49 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
4 G · 2.55 xG · +1.4
WPG
3 G · 5.07 xG · -2.1
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. SarosNSH
+2.1
C. HellebuyckWPG
-0.4

NSH finished +1.4 against expected, WPG -2.1 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
WRIST0/15
SLAP1/9
SNAP1/6
TIP IN1/7
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/14
WPG
WRIST2/31
SLAP0/7
SNAP1/7
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/6
OTHER0/19
NSH
WPG
Off the rush
3 G on 29 · 2.28 xG
1 G on 36 · 2.56 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.10 xG
1 G on 11 · 1.85 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 0-for-15, WPG 2-for-31. NSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
K. Connor
#81 · L · WPG
0 G · 3 A · 7 SOG · 25:17 TOI · +2
G. Vilardi
#13 · C · WPG
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 21:56 TOI · +2
J. Marchessault
#81 · R · NSH
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:12 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NSH stole this one. WPG owned 66% of the xG and lost.
  • J. Saros (NSH) stopped 2.1 goals above expected.
  • WPG generated far more dangerous chances — 0.067 xG/shot vs 0.050. Quality over quantity.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • WPG created 11 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WPG underperformed xG by 2.1 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Saros (NSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • WPG power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 18 PP shots (1.41 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at WPG · 8:00 PM ET

Predators at Jets: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:34 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
WPG
Model favorite
49%
51%
NSH50WPG

WPG by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NSH 2.52.6 WPG; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →WPG
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
50.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.34
2.58xGA / 602.55
1.84Goals for / gm1.90
2.21Goals against / gm2.10
0.992PDO — luck, not skill0.998

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (0.992 vs 0.998) says WPG has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.5 to 2.6 expected goals per team, leaving Winnipeg at 51% win probability. This is as close to a pick'em as the sport gets.

Winnipeg has momentum: 6-2-2 over their last 10 games. But the underlying 5v5 picture is nearly symmetrical. Nashville posts 49.0% expected goal share and 50.0% Corsi; Winnipeg sits at 48.0% and 49.0%. Their PDO figures—0.992 and 0.998—are indistinguishable noise.

The swing factor could be goaltending. J. Annunen is on a back-to-back, which usually means either a backup start or a starter playing on fumes.

Nashville's top scorers are Zachary L'Heureux and Filip Forsberg. L'Heureux generates 0.85 expected goals per 60 with 4 goals on 16.0% shooting—a rate destined to regress—but has 1 high-danger goal backing the efficiency. Forsberg runs 0.80 xG/60, has 23 goals at 13.6% shooting, and 4 high-danger goals, suggesting he's sustaining his run through both volume and shot quality.

Winnipeg's Nino Niederreiter posts 0.87 xG/60 with 6 goals and 6 assists despite an 8.6% shooting rate and 3 high-danger markers—a profile that says the goals should keep coming. Kyle Connor, the team's leading scorer at 25 goals and 30 assists, plays at 0.83 xG/60 on 13.0% shooting with only 2 high-danger goals, a red flag that his current pace is unsustainable.

Both teams are posting 0% high-danger goal rates and 0% rebound goal rates, suggesting either measurement gaps or teams finding offense through play outside the danger zone. Nashville's Jonathan Marchessault represents a defensive liability; Winnipeg's Colin Miller is flagged as vulnerable on the back end.

Every number points the same direction: this is a coin flip. The winner will likely be whichever team avoids mistakes late and solves whatever goaltending situation Nashville's back-to-back creates.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters