Backcheck
Recap · BUF at LAK

Sabres pull away from the Kings

The Sabres won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 8:08 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
BUF
Buffalo Sabres
4
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.77Expected goals2.61
51% share for the better side
34Shot attempts (SOG)27
4High-danger chances5
58Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 52% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Sabres' 4-1 victory over the Kings obscured a game that expected goals called nearly even. Buffalo won the underlying battle 2.77–2.61 xG—a 51–49 split that bore no resemblance to the final margin.

What made the difference was finishing. Buffalo converted 3 of 4 high-danger chances (75%); Los Angeles managed 0 for 5. Z. Benson's wrist shot from the top of the circles proved decisive. Later, R. Dahlin added another in high-danger territory.

U. Luukkonen (BUF) was the decisive factor. He made 26 saves on 27 shots, posting a 0.963 save percentage—1.61 goals better than expected—and was perfect on high-danger chances, stopping all 5. A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 30 of 32 but couldn't overcome his teammates' offensive drought.

The Kings held 44% of shot attempts (27 actual shots to 34 for Buffalo) and created legitimate chances. They crashed the net hard enough to generate 4 rebound opportunities. But they couldn't execute when it mattered. Buffalo's rush game, meanwhile, produced two goals on 27 rush attempts—clinical efficiency where it counted.

This was a game decided not by territorial control or even shot volume, but by how both teams used their high-danger looks. Buffalo capitalized; Los Angeles didn't. U. Luukkonen's wall in net made sure that gap never closed.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
BUF3 / 4 · 1.32 xG
LAK0 / 5 · 1.03 xG
Medium dangermid-range
BUF1 / 8 · 0.76 xG
LAK1 / 8 · 0.83 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
BUF0 / 46 · 0.69 xG
LAK0 / 41 · 0.75 xG

BUF went 3-for-4 from high danger on 1.32 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
BUF
4 G · 2.77 xG · +1.2
LAK
1 G · 2.61 xG · -1.6
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
U. LuukkonenBUF
+1.6
A. ForsbergLAK
+0.8

BUF finished +1.2 against expected, LAK -1.6 — U. Luukkonen (BUF) saved 1.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
BUF
WRIST2/27
SLAP0/4
SNAP0/7
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND1/2
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER1/16
LAK
WRIST0/17
SLAP1/9
SNAP0/2
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/17
BUF
LAK
Off the rush
2 G on 27 · 2.01 xG
1 G on 21 · 1.43 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 0 · 0.00 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.66 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: BUF went 2-for-27, LAK 0-for-17. BUF scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
Z. Benson
#6 · L · BUF
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 15:16 TOI · +2
R. Dahlin
#26 · D · BUF
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 23:07 TOI · +2
A. Panarin
#10 · L · LAK
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 22:06 TOI · -2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • U. Luukkonen (BUF) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
  • LAK couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • BUF was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/4 on HD chances (75%).
  • BUF was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • LAK created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • U. Luukkonen (BUF) saved 1.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • U. Luukkonen was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · BUF at LAK · 4:00 PM ET

Sabres at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 8:35 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
LAK
Model favorite
46%
54%
BUF50LAK

LAK by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score BUF 2.42.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

BUF← edge
edge →LAK
50.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.55xGF / 602.42
2.55xGA / 602.20
2.35Goals for / gm1.85
1.90Goals against / gm1.71
1.020PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.020 vs 1.002) says BUF has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a BUF 2.4-2.6 LAK game with the Kings at 54% win probability—essentially a pick'em.

Buffalo's 9-1-0 run in their last 10 games masks a structural problem: the Sabres rank 50.0% in expected goals share and 49.0% in Corsi percentage, trailing Los Angeles in both. Recent form conceals fundamental weakness.

The Kings drive territorial control at 52.0% Corsi, translating directly to volume and quality. Their 52.0% expected goals share confirms the pattern—Los Angeles is the better 5v5 team on a full sample.

Yet Buffalo's PDO sits at 1.020, an unsustainable conversion rate. Regression will come, though perhaps not tonight.

Both goaltenders are on back-to-backs. Watch for D. Kuemper to show fatigue or for a backup to start. A. Lyon faces the same situation for Buffalo.

Jason Zucker remains the Sabres' engine, generating 1.07 expected goals per 60 minutes at 15.1% shooting, supported by 6 high-danger goals across 14 goals and 14 assists. Josh Doan runs parallel at 1.01 xG/60 with 15 goals and 18 assists, though 11.5% shooting leaves less margin for variance.

Alex Laferriere anchors the Kings with 0.87 xG/60, 16 goals, 18 assists, and 9.9% conversion. Jared Wright contributes 0.83 xG/60 and 4 assists but remains goalless.

The Kings' structural advantage should yield more looks. Buffalo's recent rhythm could sustain. Back-to-back goaltending on both sides adds uncertainty. For a sport this variable, a 54% edge is the definition of a genuine coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

BUF
Jason Zucker14G 14A
1.07 xG/60 · 6 HD · 15.1% sh
Josh Doan15G 18A
1.01 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.5% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters