Backcheck
Recap · COL at WSH

Avalanche edge the Capitals in overtime

The Avalanche won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 8:27 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.88Expected goals3.07
52% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)22
4High-danger chances5
55Corsi (all attempts)42
Score-adjusted: 58% / 42%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Washington generated superior expected goals and more high-danger chances but lost 3-2 in overtime — M. Blackwood's net turned away every chance that mattered.

The Capitals held 48% of shot attempts but generated 3.07 expected goals, a quality advantage. Colorado generated 2.88 xG on 24 shots. Washington's danger per attempt was higher: 0.073 xG per shot versus Colorado's 0.052. Yet on high-danger chances, Washington managed 0-for-5. Colorado converted 2-for-4.

M. Blackwood stopped 1.07 goals above expected, including a perfect 5-for-5 save rate on high-danger shots. L. Thompson saw more danger per attempt but saved only 21 of 24.

The Capitals' efficiency off the rush (2 goals on 26 chances) matched Colorado's (3 goals on 25 chances). The advantage dissolved in the scoring areas. Washington generated 5 high-danger chances to Colorado's 4. B. Nelson tipped in at 01:22 of overtime — the game's final word.

This was a variance clinic. Washington's underlying metrics suggested they'd escape with a point. The Capitals had the shot quality and quantity to demand it. Instead, they encountered an opponent that didn't need many chances, plus a goaltender who stopped everything dangerous.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL2 / 4 · 1.01 xG
WSH0 / 5 · 1.35 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL1 / 13 · 1.39 xG
WSH2 / 12 · 1.19 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL0 / 38 · 0.48 xG
WSH0 / 25 · 0.54 xG

WSH went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.35 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
3 G · 2.88 xG · +0.1
WSH
2 G · 3.07 xG · -1.1
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
M. BlackwoodCOL
+1.1
L. ThompsonWSH
-0.1

COL finished +0.1 against expected, WSH -1.1 — M. Blackwood (COL) saved 1.1 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
SNAP2/24
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN1/3
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
WRIST0/0
OTHER0/17
WSH
SNAP1/25
SLAP1/4
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/1
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
WRIST0/1
OTHER0/7
COL
WSH
Off the rush
3 G on 25 · 2.53 xG
2 G on 26 · 2.61 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.14 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.36 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: COL went 2-for-24, WSH 1-for-25. COL scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Necas
#88 · C · COL
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 23:36 TOI · +1
B. Nelson
#11 · C · COL
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 20:13 TOI · +1
C. McMichael
#24 · L · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 20:03 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • M. Blackwood (COL) stopped 1.1 goals above expected.
  • WSH generated far more dangerous chances — 0.073 xG/shot vs 0.052. Quality over quantity.
  • WSH couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • COL was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • M. Blackwood was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at WSH · 12:30 PM ET

Avalanche at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 8:24 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
COL
Model favorite
54%
46%
COL50WSH

COL by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.82.6 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →WSH
57.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
57.0%Corsi%49.0%
3.03xGF / 602.62
2.30xGA / 602.62
2.63Goals for / gm2.18
1.56Goals against / gm1.79
1.021PDO — luck, not skill1.018

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 1.018) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.8-2.6 game with the Avalanche at 54% win probability—essentially a pick'em.

Colorado owns the underlying play. At 5v5, the Avalanche generate 57.0% xG and drive 57.0% Corsi, controlling both territory and shot quality. Washington's 50.0% xG reflects a team playing catchup. That gap would usually settle a matchup decisively. Not this one, because both teams are running above expected luck.

Colorado's 1.021 PDO and Washington's 1.018 PDO mean both are converting at unsustainable rates and allowing fewer goals than their defense should permit. In a true coin flip, the expectation is both regress equally. When Colorado's superior play meets equal regression for both teams, the advantage cancels.

The scorers demonstrate this distribution. Artturi Lehkonen carries Colorado at 1.11 xG/60 with 18 goals and 14.9% shooting—he's earned his output. Ross Colton, at 1.10 xG/60, has only 7 goals on 4.9% shooting, leaving room for variance in either direction. Alex Ovechkin leads Washington at 19 goals, but his 0.97 xG/60 and 13.8% shooting rate show he's running ahead of his opportunities. Anthony Beauvillier, at 14 goals on 10.4% shooting, similarly exceeds his 0.89 xG/60.

M. Blackwood's back-to-back status is the sole lever. If Washington starts a backup or Blackwood plays tired, Colorado gets an edge. If Blackwood is fresh, the scales balance.

The verdict: when unsustainably hot teams both cool down, the one with superior underlying play wins. When luck persists, the lucky team does. This is a matchup where a coin flip is the most honest forecast.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters