Panthers edge the Kraken in a shootout
The Panthers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.
The underlying story
The Panthers won because they scored more than they deserved. Expected goals favored Seattle 3.67–3.47; the Panthers overperformed their xG by 1.53 goals, turning a close game into a shootout victory.
The underlying play was tight. The Kraken created more high-danger chances (8–6). The Panthers generated 4 goals on 25 rush attempts, compared to Seattle's 3 on the same volume—a marginal efficiency gain that proved decisive. Rebound chances told a different story: the Panthers created four but converted none, showing that their offensive pressure came from speed, not setup play.
Vinnie Hinostroza's backhander from the doorstep in the shootout sealed it, the moment a team that had underperformed its fundamentals finally got lucky when it mattered most.
The goaltending split reflected the game's chaos. J. Daccord stopped 21 of 24 (0.875 SV%), while S. Bobrovsky made 23 of 27 (0.852 SV%). Neither was dominant, but both faced a barrage of chances and survived. The Panthers' ability to finish at the rush—and the Kraken's relative inability to convert their chances elsewhere—made the difference.
The danger ladder
SEA went 1-for-33 from low danger on 0.36 expected goals — 0.6 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
SEA finished +0.3 against expected, FLA +1.5 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 0.5 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 1-for-21, FLA 1-for-7. FLA scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- FLA was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 25 rush chances.
- SEA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 25 rush chances.
- FLA created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.