Backcheck
Recap · SJS at CBJ

Sharks run the Blue Jackets off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Sharks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 9:16 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
SJS
San Jose Sharks
3
Home
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.82Expected goals2.34
67% share for the better side
36Shot attempts (SOG)24
8High-danger chances2
65Corsi (all attempts)45
Score-adjusted: 61% / 39%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Sharks won 3–2 in a game where the underlying metrics told a different story than the final score.

San Jose controlled 67% of expected goals (4.82–2.34), a decisive advantage in puck possession and shot quality. They generated 8 high-danger chances to Columbus's 2, and their shot quality was sharper: 0.074 xG per shot vs. 0.052. Yet they converted zero of those eight premium looks.

E. Merzlikins prevented a wider margin. Columbus's goaltender stopped 1.82 goals above expected and stood perfect on eight high-danger shots. The Sharks underperformed their own xG by 1.82 goals, wasting their advantage in both volume and quality.

Columbus found efficiency through transition, scoring 2 goals on 23 rush chances despite holding only 40% of shot attempts (24–36). San Jose matched that output on 29 rush chances. The Sharks' dominance should have translated to a bigger margin, but Merzlikins' performance kept the result close.

A. Nedeljkovic stopped 22 of 24 for San Jose (0.917 SV%), posting the same save percentage as Merzlikins while facing weaker shot quality.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SJS0 / 8 · 2.26 xG
CBJ0 / 2 · 0.46 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SJS2 / 15 · 1.80 xG
CBJ1 / 12 · 1.37 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SJS1 / 42 · 0.76 xG
CBJ1 / 31 · 0.51 xG

SJS went 0-for-8 from high danger on 2.26 expected goals — 2.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SJS
3 G · 4.82 xG · -1.8
CBJ
2 G · 2.34 xG · -0.3
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. NedeljkovicSJS
+0.3
E. MerzlikinsCBJ
+1.8

SJS finished -1.8 against expected, CBJ -0.3 — E. Merzlikins (CBJ) saved 1.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SJS
SNAP2/19
WRIST0/20
SLAP1/4
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/14
CBJ
SNAP1/17
WRIST1/5
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/10
SJS
CBJ
Off the rush
2 G on 29 · 2.69 xG
2 G on 23 · 1.88 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 1.10 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.16 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: SJS went 2-for-19, CBJ 1-for-17. SJS scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Celebrini
#71 · C · SJS
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 19:42 TOI · +2
W. Smith
#2 · C · SJS
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 19:14 TOI · +1
I. Chernyshov
#92 · L · SJS
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 15:31 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • E. Merzlikins (CBJ) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • SJS had the higher quality looks — 0.074 xG/shot vs 0.052.
  • SJS couldn't convert — 0/8 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • SJS was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • SJS created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • SJS underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • E. Merzlikins (CBJ) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • E. Merzlikins was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 8 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · SJS at CBJ · 5:00 PM ET

The Blue Jackets are the model's lean over the Sharks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 9:14 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
CBJ
Model favorite
44%
56%
SJS50CBJ

CBJ by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SJS 2.42.7 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

SJS← edge
edge →CBJ
48.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
47.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.33xGF / 602.63
2.56xGA / 602.43
1.99Goals for / gm2.12
2.32Goals against / gm1.98
0.998PDO — luck, not skill1.003

CBJ holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.998 vs 1.003) says CBJ has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a SJS 2.4-2.7 CBJ game with the Blue Jackets at 56% win probability. That edge rests on Columbus's dominance in underlying play.

The Blue Jackets are the hotter team lately, riding a 6-2-2 stretch against San Jose's -17 goal differential over the same span—a gap that reflects both porous Sharks defense and inconsistent scoring.

At 5v5, the separation is stark. Columbus owns 52.0% expected goals compared to San Jose's 48.0%, indicating the Jackets generate better looks from inside the scoring area. Corsi reinforces the possession edge: Columbus holds 51.0% against the Sharks' 47.0%, meaning territorial control should favor the visitors. PDO—0.998 for San Jose, 1.003 for Columbus—suggests neither team is riding unsustainable luck.

Columbus's advantage hinges on consistent offensive execution. Boone Jenner (0.98 xG/60, 11G, 21A) anchors the offense with elite playmaking volume, while Mathieu Olivier (0.89 xG/60, 12G, 9A) provides secondary punch. Both will test the Sharks' capacity to limit high-danger chances, particularly against Conor Garland's shaky defensive positioning.

San Jose's offensive load rests on Igor Chernyshov (0.91 xG/60, 6G, 8A, 15.0% shooting), as the team's top threat—Pavol Regenda (1.10 xG/60, 5G, 1A)—is marked likely out. That removal diminishes the Sharks' top-end scoring potential.

A. Nedeljkovic's status matters. On a back-to-back, Columbus might deploy a backup or run their starter tired. Either scenario affects the Blue Jackets' defensive reliability. The underlying advantage only holds if goaltending doesn't falter.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters