Backcheck
Recap · PHI at NYI

Flyers run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 10:27 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
4
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.13Expected goals3.20
62% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)22
7High-danger chances5
47Corsi (all attempts)64
Score-adjusted: 37% / 64%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Flyers demolished the Islanders 4-1, and the underlying numbers showed a massacre. Philadelphia controlled 62% of 5v5 expected goals (5.13–3.20) — a gap that made even the final margin look close.

The Islanders generated shot volume (51% of attempts at 22–21) but manufactured nothing dangerous. Their expected goals landed at 38% despite nearly matching Philadelphia's shot count. This split widened when it mattered: Philly averaged 0.109 xG per shot; the Islanders managed just 0.050. Volume and quality are different skills, and New York failed at the latter.

Both teams buried zero high-danger chances — the Islanders 0-for-5, Philadelphia 0-for-7 — a mutual ice-cold finish that shouldn't happen twice in one night. It didn't matter. The Flyers monetized elsewhere: three goals off the rush from 21 chances, and six rebound opportunities with one converted. They crashed the net; the Islanders didn't.

D. Vladar stole the show in net. He stopped 21 of 22 shots (0.955 SV%) and outperformed his expected save percentage by 2.20 goals — a wall on high-danger looks, surrendering nothing of substance. I. Sorokin managed 17 of 21 (0.810 SV%), beating expected by 1.13 but unable to stop the onslaught. The Flyers' underlying edge was simply too wide.

Philadelphia's attack was surgical. #39 M. Michkov (1G–2A, 11:43) and #6 T. Sanheim (1G–1A, 24:36) led the way. #20 A. Bump (1G–1A, 09:09) applied the finishing touches.

The scoreline was decisive. The underlying dominance was categorical.

  • #39 M. Michkov (PHI) — 1G, 2A in 11:43
  • #6 T. Sanheim (PHI) — 1G, 1A in 24:36
  • #20 A. Bump (PHI) — 1G, 1A in 09:09
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI0 / 7 · 3.21 xG
NYI0 / 5 · 1.63 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI3 / 13 · 1.60 xG
NYI1 / 11 · 1.05 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI1 / 27 · 0.32 xG
NYI0 / 48 · 0.52 xG

PHI went 0-for-7 from high danger on 3.21 expected goals — 3.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
4 G · 5.13 xG · -1.1
NYI
1 G · 3.20 xG · -2.2
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+2.2
I. SorokinNYI
+1.1

PHI finished -1.1 against expected, NYI -2.2 — D. Vladar (PHI) saved 2.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST1/22
SNAP1/4
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND2/3
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/11
NYI
WRIST1/20
SNAP0/13
TIP IN0/1
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
POKE0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/27
PHI
NYI
Off the rush
3 G on 21 · 1.75 xG
1 G on 22 · 2.02 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 6 · 0.95 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.03 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 1-for-22, NYI 1-for-20. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Michkov
#39 · R · PHI
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 11:43 TOI · +3
T. Sanheim
#6 · D · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 24:36 TOI · +3
A. Bump
#20 · L · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 09:09 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 2.2 goals above expected.
  • PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.109 xG/shot vs 0.050.
  • NYI couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PHI couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • PHI created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI underperformed xG by 2.2 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) saved 2.2 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Vladar was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at NYI · 7:00 PM ET

Flyers at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 10:09 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
PHI
Model favorite
50%
50%
PHI50NYI

PHI by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.52.5 NYI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →NYI
51.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.48
2.20xGA / 602.69
1.96Goals for / gm1.78
1.82Goals against / gm1.94
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.993

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.993) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects PHI 2.5 - 2.5 NYI with the Flyers at 50% win probability — about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Philadelphia owns the underlying play, generating 51.0% of expected goals at 5v5 compared to the Islanders' 48.0%. That advantage translates to sustained offensive pressure, but it narrows when accounting for rest: New York arrives on three days of recovery while the Flyers have only one.

S. Ersson enters on a back-to-back, creating uncertainty around Philadelphia's goaltending availability. Whether he starts fresh, appears fatigued, or cedes the net to a backup shapes the team's offensive burden.

The Islanders' rest edge directly counters Philadelphia's possession advantage. Three days of recovery will amplify their structural discipline, potentially suppressing the Flyers' shot-generation rate.

Owen Tippett anchors the Flyers' threat with 0.88 expected goals per 60 minutes, 19 goals, 18 assists, 2 high-danger chances, and a 12.1% shooting percentage. Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 21 assists, 3 high-danger chances, 11.2% shooting) compounds that firepower but represents Philadelphia's defensive liability.

Anders Lee carries the Islanders at 1.20 xG/60 with 9 goals, 20 assists, 2 high-danger chances, and 6.4% shooting. Bo Horvat (0.87 xG/60, 18 goals, 10 assists, 3 high-danger chances, 12.8% shooting) doubles that punch. Alexander Romanov anchors the Islanders' blue line, which projects as their defensive vulnerability.

Philadelphia wins if their underlying advantage survives short rest. New York wins if rest discipline tightens structure and limits shot generation. S. Ersson's performance becomes the decisive variable.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters