Kings run the Maple Leafs off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Kings' 7-6 overtime victory understates their dominance. They generated 68% of expected goals (5.49–2.56), a measure of shot quality, and held 67% of shot attempts (40–20). Yet this 14-point margin compressed to a one-goal scoreboard win—a gap that points to a single culprit: Toronto got exceptionally lucky. The Leafs outperformed their xG by 3.44 goals; the Kings added just 1.51 to theirs.
Toronto's conversion in high-danger areas drove the luck. They buried 2 of 5 prime scoring chances (40%), a rate far above typical. Off the rush, they were equally sharp: 5 goals on 21 attempts, a finish rate that overcomes territorial disadvantage.
The goaltending metrics isolate the variance. J. Woll saved 33 of 40 shots at 0.825 SV%, a mark 1.51 goals below expectation given shot volume. D. Kuemper stopped 14 of 20 at 0.700 SV%, missing expectation by 3.44 despite lighter traffic. Low-danger shooting benefited Los Angeles—2 goals from spots where conversion typically fails. The Kings also created 7 rebound opportunities to Toronto's 3, a net-front advantage that surfaced on the scoreboard despite their broader underlying margin.
Quinton Byfield ended it at 02:33 of overtime with a wrist shot from the slot.
The danger ladder
TOR went 4-for-10 from medium danger on 0.99 expected goals — 3.0 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
TOR finished +3.4 against expected, LAK +1.5 — D. Kuemper (LAK) allowed 3.4 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: TOR went 4-for-23, LAK 4-for-41. LAK scored 7 of theirs off the rush.
- J. Woll (TOR) gave up 1.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- TOR was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
- LAK scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- LAK was lethal off the rush — 7 goals on 42 rush chances.
- TOR was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 21 rush chances.
- LAK created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- TOR created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- LAK outperformed their expected goals by 1.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- TOR outperformed their expected goals by 3.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.