Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at DET

Blue Jackets edge the Red Wings in a shootout

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 10:42 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
4
Home
DET
Detroit Red Wings
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.18Expected goals3.45
55% share for the better side
35Shot attempts (SOG)37
7High-danger chances4
80Corsi (all attempts)78
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus won 4-3 in a shootout despite conceding far more high-danger chances — 7 to 4 — and trailing in expected goals 4.18 to 3.45. The Red Wings controlled the board and the underlying scoring chances yet couldn't finish. Columbus's power play provided the margin: 2 goals on 13 shots (0.49 xG), while Detroit scored none. Rush goals split evenly — each team scored 3. J. Greaves posted a 0.919 save percentage on 34 stops. Z. Werenski's wrist shot from the slot in the shootout ended it.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ1 / 7 · 1.67 xG
DET1 / 4 · 1.09 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ1 / 16 · 1.78 xG
DET1 / 14 · 1.29 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ1 / 57 · 0.72 xG
DET1 / 60 · 1.07 xG

CBJ went 1-for-16 from medium danger on 1.78 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
4 G · 4.18 xG · -0.2
DET
3 G · 3.45 xG · -0.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GreavesCBJ
+0.4
J. GibsonDET
+1.2

CBJ finished -0.2 against expected, DET -0.5 — J. Gibson (DET) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST1/29
SNAP1/10
SLAP1/4
TIP IN0/9
BACKHAND0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/27
DET
WRIST2/20
SNAP0/12
SLAP1/12
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/4
WRAP AROUND0/2
OTHER0/25
CBJ
DET
Off the rush
3 G on 36 · 2.86 xG
3 G on 41 · 2.99 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 1.01 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.02 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 1-for-29, DET 2-for-20. CBJ scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 33:26 TOI
J. Faulk
#72 · D · DET
2 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 23:40 TOI · +2
D. Larkin
#71 · C · DET
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 23:20 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Gibson (DET) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • DET was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 41 rush chances.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • CBJ created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 13 PP shots (0.49 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at DET · 7:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Red Wings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 10:40 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
CBJ
Model favorite
51%
49%
CBJ50DET

CBJ by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.62.5 DET; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →DET
52.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
51.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.63xGF / 602.38
2.43xGA / 602.50
2.12Goals for / gm1.73
1.98Goals against / gm2.07
1.003PDO — luck, not skill0.985

CBJ holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 0.985) says CBJ has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a CBJ 2.6 - 2.5 DET matchup with the Blue Jackets at 51% win probability—as close to a pick'em as the math gets.

Columbus owns the underlying play, holding 52.0% expected goals and 51.0% Corsi against Detroit's 49.0% in both categories. Yet the Blue Jackets are -5 in goal differential over their last 10, exposing the gap between what their shot quality says they should be getting and what's actually going in the net. Detroit's 0.985 PDO hints at the inverse: the Red Wings are getting outplayed but haven't collapsed because their luck has run slightly behind their actual performance.

Boone Jenner is the engine for Columbus, generating 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes with 11 goals and 21 assists at a 9.6% shooting rate. That conversion is already high; further gains require things outside shot quality to break right. Mathieu Olivier at 0.89 xG per 60 is shooting at 13.3%, which is exceptional, though he may be unavailable after nine days away from the lineup—his 12 goals and 9 assists mask an unsustainable pace. Alex DeBrincat answers for Detroit, generating 0.88 xG per 60 with 17 goals and 28 assists at a sustainable 9.0% shooting rate. Marco Kasper produces 0.81 xG per 60 with 7 goals and 8 assists at 6.1% shooting, suggesting the Red Wings have genuine upside if his conversion normalizes.

The finish line is where this game unravels. Columbus shows 0% on both high-danger and rebound opportunities—meaning they're generating volume in the hard areas but not converting it. Detroit mirrors that complete shutdown on high-danger chances. Conor Garland is Columbus's defensive liability; Axel Sandin-Pellikka is Detroit's. Each team has exposed depth on the back end that the other could exploit.

This game lives at the margin. Columbus has the play; Detroit has the star power and the unpredictability of what happens when a team shoots below its process. The 51% projection reflects that balance exactly.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters