Backcheck
Recap · COL at STL

Avalanche hold off the Blues

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 10:46 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
Home
STL
St. Louis Blues
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.18Expected goals2.80
60% share for the better side
37Shot attempts (SOG)19
6High-danger chances6
73Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

High-danger chances tied 6-6, yet Colorado won 3-1. That gap—the Avalanche's conversion against St. Louis's inability to finish—tells the real story. Colorado dominated play (60% of expected goals at 5-on-5, 4.18–2.80) and converted their opportunities; the Blues wasted theirs.

The Avalanche added two rush-chance goals on 23 attempts, extending their advantage. S. Wedgewood stopped 18 of 19 shots (0.947 SV%, plus-1.80 against expected) and saved all six high-danger attempts, producing a dominant display.

St. Louis underperformed their expected goals by 1.80, a clear measure of wasted chances. Robert Thomas scored in the second period from the doorstep, but Colorado's dominance was never threatened. J. Hofer made 34 of 37 saves (0.919 SV%, plus-1.18), but facing 37 shots was simply too much. The Blues held 34% of shot attempts, a deficit they couldn't overcome.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL1 / 6 · 1.78 xG
STL0 / 6 · 1.38 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL2 / 13 · 1.57 xG
STL1 / 9 · 1.02 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL0 / 54 · 0.83 xG
STL0 / 36 · 0.40 xG

STL went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.38 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
3 G · 4.18 xG · -1.2
STL
1 G · 2.80 xG · -1.8
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. WedgewoodCOL
+1.8
J. HoferSTL
+1.2

COL finished -1.2 against expected, STL -1.8 — S. Wedgewood (COL) saved 1.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
WRIST1/21
SLAP0/14
TIP IN1/8
SNAP0/5
BACKHAND0/3
BETWEEN LEGS1/1
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/19
STL
WRIST1/20
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/1
SNAP0/3
BACKHAND0/4
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/20
COL
STL
Off the rush
2 G on 23 · 2.47 xG
1 G on 20 · 1.94 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.18 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.29 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: COL went 1-for-21, STL 1-for-20. COL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
V. Nichushkin
#13 · R · COL
2 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 15:45 TOI · +2
R. Thomas
#18 · C · STL
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 24:04 TOI
D. Toews
#7 · D · COL
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 23:44 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • STL couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • STL underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • S. Wedgewood was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at STL · 8:00 PM ET

Avalanche at Blues: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 10:43 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
COL
Model favorite
55%
45%
COL50STL

COL by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.72.4 STL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →STL
57.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
57.0%Corsi%48.0%
3.03xGF / 602.34
2.30xGA / 602.40
2.63Goals for / gm2.00
1.56Goals against / gm2.12
1.021PDO — luck, not skill1.000

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 1.000) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects Colorado at 55% win probability—essentially a toss-up. MoneyPuck's expected-score spread is 2.7 to 2.4 Avalanche.

Colorado owns the underlying play. At 5v5, the Avalanche generate 57.0% of expected goals against 49.0% for St. Louis. Their Corsi advantage—57.0% to 48.0%—means territorial control. This is dominance, not luck.

But Colorado is running hot. The Avalanche sit at 1.021 PDO; St. Louis is at 1.000. One team's results exceed its underlying numbers, the other's don't. That gap will shrink. On a night when Colorado's luck normalizes, the outcome could flip.

J. Hofer and M. Blackwood both face back-to-backs, introducing fatigue neither team fully controls.

Artturi Lehkonen drives Colorado's offense: 1.11 expected goals per 60 minutes, 18 goals, 22 assists, 14.9% shooting rate. Ross Colton mirrors the xG/60 (1.10) but converts at just 4.9%—7 goals on 15 assists. St. Louis counters with Jimmy Snuggerud (0.86 xG/60, 15 goals, 22 assists, 11.9% shooting) and Dylan Holloway (0.82 xG/60, 13 goals, 24 assists, 10.8% shooting). Snuggerud and Holloway offer secondary scoring, but neither reaches Lehkonen's tier.

Colorado's play-driving edge is real. They control shot generation and territory. St. Louis plays at expected value, which is stable but not explosive. Ordinarily, Colorado's dominance would be decisive. But unsustainable PDO is a clock—the Avalanche are running borrowed time. When that normalizes, a St. Louis team operating from expected value might find room to play. The model sees it clearly: a true coin flip, and flips go both ways.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters