Wild pull away from the Kraken
The Wild earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Minnesota's dominance went beyond the 5-2 scoreline. The Wild's shot quality was nearly twice Seattle's — they generated 0.084 expected goals per attempt, compared to the Kraken's 0.045.
That efficiency gap explains their dominance. Minnesota held 52% of shot attempts (29–27 on goal) and 58% of 5v5 expected goals (3.97–2.88). High-danger chances ran 9–1 in Minnesota's favor.
J. Wallstedt deserved credit for the margin. He overperformed his expected goals by 0.88, posting a 0.926 save percentage on 25 saves. J. Daccord, facing relentless pressure, finished at 0.857 and underperformed his xG by 0.88.
Minnesota's danger came from two sources: the rush and the net. The Wild scored twice off 23 rush chances and converted 2 of 4 rebound opportunities, a sign of effective net-crashing. Seattle countered from low-leverage spots, scoring on chances with just 0.045 expected goals each — the kind of goals a goalie typically stops.
The turning point came early. J. Eriksson Ek's wrist shot from the wing at 17:17 of the third period gave Minnesota separation they wouldn't relinquish.
The danger ladder
SEA went 0-for-14 from medium danger on 1.51 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
SEA finished -0.9 against expected, MIN +1.0 — J. Wallstedt (MIN) saved 0.9 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 0-for-26, MIN 4-for-19. MIN scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- MIN generated far more dangerous chances — 0.084 xG/shot vs 0.045. Quality over quantity.
- SEA scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- MIN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
- MIN created 4 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.