Kraken edge the Golden Knights in a shootout
The Kraken stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.96–3.24 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The underlying numbers favored Vegas, but Seattle's goaltending and a shootout winner rewrote the script. The Kraken beat the Golden Knights 4–3 despite being outshot in expected goals, 3.24–3.96.
Vegas generated higher-quality chances—0.061 expected goals per shot versus Seattle's 0.046—and held a 55–45 xG advantage. Yet the Kraken controlled shot volume at 48% (33–35 on goal) and converted high-danger chances more ruthlessly: 4–3 over the Knights.
J. Daccord (SEA) stopped 32 of 35 shots (0.914 SV%), outperforming his xG model by 0.96 goals. A. Hill (VGK) made 30 saves on 33 shots (0.909 SV%). Seattle also squeezed more from chaos: they created four rebound opportunities despite converting none, a sign of aggressive net-front play.
Both teams were lethal on the rush, each scoring three goals from transitions (Seattle on 39 attempts, Vegas on 35). Neither team could finish at even strength, forcing a shootout where Berkly Catton's wrist shot decided it.
Vegas dominated analytically. Seattle won the game. Daccord was sharper than Hill, and Catton's goal merely confirmed Seattle's edge in execution.
The danger ladder
VGK went 1-for-17 from medium danger on 2.05 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
VGK finished -1.0 against expected, SEA +0.8 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 1.0 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 1-for-31, SEA 2-for-28. VGK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- VGK had the higher quality looks — 0.061 xG/shot vs 0.046.
- SEA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 39 rush chances.
- VGK was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 35 rush chances.
- SEA created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.