Kings run the Kraken off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Kraken held 52% of shot attempts. The underlying numbers said otherwise. The Kings controlled 60% of 5v5 expected goals (5.22–3.43), a margin that exposed the quality gap beneath Seattle's shot volume.
The Kraken shot worse. The Kings generated 0.079 xG per attempt; Seattle mustered 0.048. When the Kings took fewer chances on better ice and better angles, the scoreboard followed.
On the rush, the Kings scored three goals on 26 chances; Seattle managed two on 31. In front of the net, the Kings created eight rebound opportunities and converted two; Seattle generated three and converted zero.
N. Kokko stopped 1.22 goals above expected (0.862 SV%). A. Forsberg recorded 30 saves on 33 shots (0.909 SV%), but the Kings had already won the game upstream.
The 5-3 scoreline flattered Seattle.
The danger ladder
LAK went 1-for-8 from high danger on 2.63 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
LAK finished -0.2 against expected, SEA -0.4 — N. Kokko (SEA) saved 1.2 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: LAK went 3-for-30, SEA 1-for-30. LAK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- SEA had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- N. Kokko (SEA) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- LAK had the higher quality looks — 0.079 xG/shot vs 0.048.
- SEA scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- LAK scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 31 rush chances.
- LAK was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 26 rush chances.
- SEA created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- LAK created 8 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.