Mammoth run the Jets off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Mammoth earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Utah's 5-3 win over Winnipeg was more convincing than the score. The Mammoth dominated expected goals 5.24 to 2.90—a 64-36 split that reflected total control.
Utah held 60% of shot attempts (36-24) and won high-danger chances 8-5, converting 50% of them. The Mammoth were ruthless off the rush with 3 goals on 32 chances. On the power play, Utah scored twice on 15 shots (1.31 xG) versus Winnipeg's two goals on 6 attempts (0.63 xG).
E. Comrie stopped 31 of 35 shots, posting a save percentage 1.24 goals above expected. K. Vejmelka finished at 0.875 save percentage (21-24). Both teams crashed the net effectively—Utah with 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted), Winnipeg with 6 opportunities (1 converted).
Alexander Kerfoot's wrist shot from the high slot in the third period proved decisive.
The danger ladder
UTA went 4-for-8 from high danger on 2.38 expected goals — 1.6 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
WPG finished +0.1 against expected, UTA -0.2 — E. Comrie (WPG) saved 1.2 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: WPG went 2-for-18, UTA 0-for-21. UTA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- E. Comrie (WPG) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- UTA was clinical in the high-danger zone — 4/8 on HD chances (50%).
- UTA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
- UTA created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- WPG created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 15 PP shots (1.31 xG).
- WPG power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 6 PP shots (0.63 xG).