Backcheck
Recap · NYI at WSH

I. Sorokin stands tall as the Islanders edge the Capitals

The Islanders earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:06 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
3
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.13Expected goals3.66
53% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)23
7High-danger chances8
54Corsi (all attempts)52
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Capitals had the underlying advantage and lost 3-1 anyway. Expected goals split 4.13 to 3.66 in their favor, high-danger chances nearly even at 8–7—yet the Islanders got the win. That gap traces directly to Sorokin, who finished at 0.957 save percentage and stopped 2.66 goals above expected.

The game itself stayed tactically balanced: 23 shot attempts each, 15 combined high-danger chances. Washington pressed effectively, generating five rebound opportunities without converting any—a rare miss for a net-crashing team. L. Thompson faced 22 shots and saved 2.13 goals above expected, a strong line, but the Capitals still couldn't overcome the deficit.

The Islanders' edge came through transition. Two goals on 25 rush chances—a conversion rate that neutralized Washington's underlying advantage. Mathew Barzal's snap shot from the point at 18:44 of the second set the tone the Capitals never answered.

Washington finished 2.66 goals below expected. When a team carries better underlying metrics to a three-goal loss, goaltending tilts the result. Thompson performed above his expected line. Sorokin performed farther above his. One save percentage at 0.957, one at 0.909—the difference decided an otherwise even game.

The Three Stars:

  • #3 M. Roy (WSH) — 1A in 21:21
  • #14 B. Horvat (NYI) — 1G in 20:34
  • #6 J. Chychrun (WSH) — 1A in 20:21
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI2 / 7 · 1.95 xG
WSH1 / 8 · 1.97 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI1 / 16 · 1.81 xG
WSH0 / 12 · 1.35 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 31 · 0.36 xG
WSH0 / 32 · 0.33 xG

WSH went 0-for-12 from medium danger on 1.35 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
3 G · 4.13 xG · -1.1
WSH
1 G · 3.66 xG · -2.7
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+2.7
L. ThompsonWSH
+2.1

NYI finished -1.1 against expected, WSH -2.7 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
SNAP2/22
SLAP0/8
WRIST0/5
TIP IN1/2
BACKHAND0/3
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/14
WSH
SNAP1/15
SLAP0/7
WRIST0/6
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/0
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/18
NYI
WSH
Off the rush
2 G on 25 · 2.60 xG
1 G on 20 · 2.43 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.24 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.79 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYI went 2-for-22, WSH 1-for-15. NYI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Roy
#3 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:21 TOI
B. Horvat
#14 · C · NYI
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 20:34 TOI · +1
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:21 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 2.7 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (WSH 8, NYI 7).
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • WSH created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH underperformed xG by 2.7 — wasted quality chances.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 2.1 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Islanders at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:04 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
WSH
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYI50WSH

WSH by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.52.8 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →WSH
48.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
49.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.62
2.69xGA / 602.62
1.78Goals for / gm2.18
1.94Goals against / gm1.79
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.018

WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.8 goal spread with Washington at 54% win probability—a coin flip with slight Capitals lean.

New York has slipped to -5 goal differential over its last ten games. At 48.0% expected goals, the Islanders are underperforming expectation in shot quality; Washington's 50.0% xG% sits modestly above, though both sit at 49.0% Corsis.

Washington's real edge is managerial: the Capitals are running a 1.018 PDO, cashing chances at rates that won't hold. Regression is near. New York's 0.993 sits at league-expected levels, suggesting their recent skid reflects actual play drift rather than variance luck.

The goaltending axis tilts toward uncertainty. D. Rittich enters on the second half of a back-to-back, a scenario that often yields either a backup start or a fatigued starter—neither helps Washington's cause.

Offensively, Anders Lee drives New York's attack at 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes, converting at a bloated 6.4% rate (9 goals, 20 assists) that obscures genuine quality—he's posted two high-danger goals. Bo Horvat's 12.8% conversion is more sustainable: 18 goals on 0.87 xG per 60 yields real upside from his three high-danger tallies.

Washington counters with Alex Ovechkin at 0.97 xG per 60, a dip from his career average. His 13.8% shooting (19 goals, 17 assists) is inflated; two high-danger goals offer some shelter, but expect regression. Anthony Beauvillier's steadier profile—0.89 xG per 60, 14 goals at a realistic 10.4%, anchored by two high-danger conversions—poses the greater long-term threat.

Defensively, Alexander Romanov and Declan Chisholm both present weak links, though neither team generates rebounds or high-danger chances at rates that fully exploit those gaps. The defensive vulnerabilities exist; the volume to punish them does not.

This is as close as it gets.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters