Backcheck
Recap · DET at ANA

Ducks pull away from the Red Wings

The Ducks won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:23 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DET
Detroit Red Wings
2
Home
ANA
Anaheim Ducks
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.39Expected goals4.24
51% share for the better side
30Shot attempts (SOG)32
8High-danger chances3
62Corsi (all attempts)57
Score-adjusted: 57% / 43%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Anaheim won 5-2, but Detroit nearly won on paper. Expected goals favored the Red Wings 4.39 to 4.24—a structure that should've protected them. The Ducks escaped a victory they didn't fully earn.

L. Dostal stole the game. The Ducks' goaltender stopped 2.4 goals above expected, converting Anaheim's defensive liability into saves. Detroit underperformed their 4.39 xG by 2.39 goals, a collapse especially damaging because they created eight high-danger chances to Anaheim's three. When a team generates the better looks and still loses by three, goaltending usually takes the blame—and J. Gibson's 0.871 save percentage (27 of 31) should shoulder it.

Anaheim's efficiency off the rush masked their underlying disadvantage: three goals on 29 chances versus Detroit's two on identical volume. Detroit's structural advantage evaporated in the rebound zone, where they generated six opportunities but converted zero—a wasteful pattern that defined their night.

L. Carlsson led Anaheim with one goal and three assists in 15:44. T. Terry contributed two goals and an assist across 17:17. C. Gauthier added two assists in 18:21. Detroit's skaters created; Anaheim's finished.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DET1 / 8 · 1.91 xG
ANA1 / 3 · 1.18 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DET1 / 20 · 1.89 xG
ANA3 / 22 · 2.48 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DET0 / 34 · 0.59 xG
ANA1 / 32 · 0.57 xG

DET went 1-for-8 from high danger on 1.91 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DET
2 G · 4.39 xG · -2.4
ANA
5 G · 4.24 xG · +0.8
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GibsonDET
+0.2
L. DostalANA
+2.4

DET finished -2.4 against expected, ANA +0.8 — L. Dostal (ANA) saved 2.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DET
WRIST2/23
SNAP0/15
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/13
ANA
WRIST4/17
SNAP0/8
BACKHAND1/8
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/6
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/12
DET
ANA
Off the rush
2 G on 29 · 2.68 xG
3 G on 29 · 2.68 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.77 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.52 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DET went 2-for-23, ANA 4-for-17. ANA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
L. Carlsson
#91 · C · ANA
1 G · 3 A · 2 SOG · 15:44 TOI · +3
T. Terry
#19 · R · ANA
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 17:17 TOI · +3
C. Gauthier
#61 · L · ANA
0 G · 2 A · 6 SOG · 18:21 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Dostal (ANA) stopped 2.4 goals above expected.
  • ANA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • DET was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • ANA created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • L. Dostal (ANA) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DET at ANA · 10:00 PM ET

The Ducks are the model's lean over the Red Wings — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 2:05 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
ANA
Model favorite
45%
55%
DET50ANA

ANA by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score DET 2.52.8 ANA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DET← edge
edge →ANA
49.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.38xGF / 602.80
2.50xGA / 602.59
1.73Goals for / gm2.09
2.07Goals against / gm2.32
0.985PDO — luck, not skill0.981

ANA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.985 vs 0.981) says DET has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5 to 2.8 goal game favoring Anaheim at 55% win probability.

Anaheim's case rests on sustained process. The Ducks own 52.0% of expected goals at 5v5 against Detroit's 49.0%, backed by 52.0% Corsi — a pattern reflecting territorial dominance and quality shot generation.

Both teams are underperforming luck. Anaheim's PDO is 0.981, Detroit's 0.985, meaning both are running cold relative to their shot quality and goaltending. The model assumes Anaheim's edge in chance creation will overcome this variance.

Alex DeBrincat leads Detroit at 0.88 xG/60, with 17 goals, 28 assists, 2 high-danger goals, and 9.0% shooting. Marco Kasper contributes 0.81 xG/60, 7 goals, 8 assists, 1 high-danger goal, and 6.1% shooting.

Beckett Sennecke operates for Anaheim at 1.03 xG/60, posting 20 goals, 19 assists, 8 high-danger goals, and 13.5% shooting. Cutter Gauthier similarly contributes at 0.99 xG/60, with 25 goals, 16 assists, 2 high-danger goals, and 12.9% conversion.

Defensively, Axel Sandin-Pellikka is Detroit's weak link, while Mason McTavish fills that role for Anaheim. The model's lean assumes Anaheim sustains its territorial advantage long enough to win despite both teams' current PDO cold snap.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
ANA
Beckett Sennecke20G 19A
1.03 xG/60 · 8 HD · 13.5% sh
Cutter Gauthier25G 16A
0.99 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters