Jets hold off the Canucks
The Jets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Winnipeg beat Vancouver 5-3, but the scoreboard overstates the Jets' control. Expected goals told a tighter story: Winnipeg 4.96, Vancouver 4.47, with the Canucks generating 7 high-danger chances to the Jets' 6.
The gap between play and result came down to goaltending. Vancouver underperformed its expected goals by 1.47. T. Demko bore the cost: in relief, he stopped 5 of 8 shots (0.625 SV%), performing 1.63 goals below expectation. Starter K. Lankinen (20 saves, 0.952 SV%) was the inverse—2.59 goals above expected—yet the combined effect still fell short. For Winnipeg, C. Hellebuyck (30/33, +1.47 vs expected) maintained efficiency, allowing the lead to hold despite possession favoring Vancouver.
Both teams scored three rush goals each—Vancouver from 28 chances, Winnipeg from 24. On the power play, each team scored twice. Winnipeg did so on 0.59 expected goals; Vancouver on 0.90, the difference illustrating Winnipeg's finishing precision despite Vancouver's strategic advantage.
Alex Iafallo's wrist shot from the slot (third period, 19:12) proved pivotal. Vancouver chased with 8 rebound chances created but converted none—an offensive drought that crystallized the underlying deficit.
Q. Hughes led with 3 assists, J. Morrissey contributed 1 goal and 2 assists, and E. Pettersson added 2 assists—playmakers in a game far closer than the 5-3 final suggested.
The danger ladder
VAN went 1-for-18 from medium danger on 2.07 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
WPG finished +0.0 against expected, VAN -1.5 — K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 2.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 1-for-23, VAN 2-for-27. WPG scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- C. Hellebuyck (WPG) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
- T. Demko (VAN) gave up 1.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- VAN was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 28 rush chances.
- WPG was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
- VAN created 8 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 4.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
- T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
- VAN power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 10 PP shots (0.90 xG).
- WPG power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 10 PP shots (0.59 xG).