Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at SEA

Blue Jackets edge the Kraken in a shootout

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:47 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
2
Home
SEA
Seattle Kraken
1
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.98Expected goals3.01
57% share for the better side
34Shot attempts (SOG)23
4High-danger chances3
66Corsi (all attempts)62
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

M. Murray produced the superior goaltending: 33 saves on 34 shots (0.971 SV%, +2.98 above expected) versus J. Greaves' 22 of 23 (0.957 SV%, +2.01 above expected). By the expected goals model, Murray should have stolen a win. Yet Seattle lost 2-1, decided by Charlie Coyle's wrist shot from the slot in the shootout.

Columbus controlled 5v5 expected goals at 57% (3.98–3.01), a margin larger than shot volume alone suggested. Seattle held just 40% of shot attempts (23–34), meaning the Kraken were outshot by volume and quality. On high-danger chances, Columbus led 4–3. Neither team converted rebound opportunities: Seattle generated 5, Columbus 3, both wasting second chances.

M. Murray's +2.98 above expected—nearly a goal's worth of excellence—meant Seattle created the quality to steal this game. They didn't. The expected goals framework aligned with Columbus's precision; the shootout decided what regulation play never could. In sudden death, one shot mattered more than the underlying metrics.

Three Stars

  • #19 A. Fantilli (CBJ) — 1G in 22:54
  • #86 K. Marchenko (CBJ) — 1A in 21:19
  • #23 S. Monahan (CBJ) — 1A in 21:11
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ0 / 4 · 0.94 xG
SEA0 / 3 · 0.75 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ1 / 18 · 2.21 xG
SEA1 / 16 · 1.69 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 44 · 0.83 xG
SEA0 / 43 · 0.56 xG

CBJ went 1-for-18 from medium danger on 2.21 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
2 G · 3.98 xG · -2.0
SEA
1 G · 3.01 xG · -2.0
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GreavesCBJ
+2.0
M. MurraySEA
+3.0

CBJ finished -2.0 against expected, SEA -2.0 — M. Murray (SEA) saved 3.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST0/25
SNAP1/10
TIP IN0/8
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP0/5
BAT0/2
OTHER0/13
SEA
WRIST0/22
SNAP1/6
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/5
SLAP0/2
BAT0/0
OTHER0/21
CBJ
SEA
Off the rush
0 G on 31 · 2.40 xG
1 G on 24 · 1.93 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.72 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.78 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 0-for-25, SEA 0-for-22.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Fantilli
#19 · C · CBJ
1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 22:54 TOI
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:19 TOI · -1
S. Monahan
#23 · C · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 21:11 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) stopped 2.0 goals above expected.
  • SEA created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • SEA underperformed xG by 2.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • CBJ underperformed xG by 3.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 2.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • M. Murray (SEA) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at SEA · 10:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Kraken: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 3:34 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
CBJ
Model favorite
53%
47%
CBJ50SEA

CBJ by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score CBJ 2.62.4 SEA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →SEA
52.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
51.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.63xGF / 602.13
2.43xGA / 602.51
2.12Goals for / gm1.87
1.98Goals against / gm1.95
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.011

CBJ holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.011) says SEA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The numbers say this is essentially a draw. The model projects a 2.6-2.4 Blue Jackets win with Columbus at 53% win probability—as close to an even matchup as you'll find.

Columbus has the underlying advantage. The Blue Jackets control shot quality at 52.0% xG, compared to 46.0% for Seattle, and dominate territorial play with 51.0% Corsi. They impose their structure and generate volume in the right places. Seattle absorbs that dominance without collapsing, but the deficit matters when games are decided by a goal or two.

Seattle's recent results suggest the model might be underweighting momentum. The Kraken sit at minus-7 goal differential over their last ten games—genuinely underwater in a small sample that often predicts regression or collapse. That's the kind of stretch that can compound.

The key decision point: M. Murray is on a back-to-back. If Seattle starts a backup, Columbus's shot-quality edge becomes a tangible advantage. If Murray plays tired, expect Seattle to tighten defensively and lean on Chandler Stephenson to absorb punishment.

Columbus counters with its own vulnerability. Conor Garland is the Blue Jackets' defensive weak link, which Seattle can exploit if Berkly Catton finds space in transition.

Players to Watch

Columbus: Boone Jenner (11G 21A, 0.98 xG/60, 9.6% shooting) remains the engine; Mathieu Olivier (12G 9A, 0.89 xG/60, 13.3% shooting) provides secondary punch.

Seattle: Shane Wright (8G 10A, 0.77 xG/60, 10.4% shooting, 4 high-danger goals) and Berkly Catton (6G 8A, 0.68 xG/60, 8.8% shooting, 5 high-danger goals) carry the scoring load.

The coin flip reflects reality: Columbus has a structural advantage Seattle can overcome if goaltending holds. Watch the opening stretch to see if the model's thin edge materializes or Seattle steals a game it has no business winning.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters