Backcheck
Recap · NJD at CHI

Devils edge the Blackhawks in overtime

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:42 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NJD
New Jersey Devils
4
Home
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.93Expected goals2.86
58% share for the better side
37Shot attempts (SOG)20
6High-danger chances5
72Corsi (all attempts)43
Score-adjusted: 64% / 36%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Devils won despite an embarrassment of riches they couldn't cash: 6 high-danger chances, 0 conversions. Yet New Jersey still beat Chicago 4–3 in overtime, suggesting efficiency elsewhere mattered more than volume in the slot.

The expected goals backed the result. The Devils controlled 58% of 5v5 xG (3.93 to 2.86), indicating genuine superiority in shot quality.

But Chicago kept the volume battle competitive. The Blackhawks held 35% of shot attempts—20 to 37—a workable deficit that meant the game stayed physical and contested. They were also sharp off the rush: 3 goals on 24 chances, an efficiency that nearly carried them through. New Jersey scored 3 on the rush as well, but needed 32 attempts to get there.

Simon Nemec's wrist shot from the high slot ended it at 3:28 of overtime.

Goaltending wasn't decisive. S. Knight was sensational: 33 saves on 37 shots, a 0.892 save percentage. J. Markstrom was solid: 17 for 20, 0.850. Knight was better, and yet New Jersey still took the 2 points. The Devils' precision was the story—they scored when it mattered most, in overtime, after squandering the volume advantage they'd built.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD0 / 6 · 1.41 xG
CHI1 / 5 · 1.13 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD3 / 14 · 1.72 xG
CHI1 / 12 · 1.32 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD1 / 52 · 0.80 xG
CHI1 / 26 · 0.41 xG

NJD went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.41 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
4 G · 3.93 xG · +0.1
CHI
3 G · 2.86 xG · +0.1
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. MarkstromNJD
-0.1
S. KnightCHI
-0.1

NJD finished +0.1 against expected, CHI +0.1 — J. Markstrom (NJD) allowed 0.1 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST2/41
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND1/4
SNAP0/1
SLAP1/4
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/16
CHI
WRIST0/16
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND1/3
SNAP1/6
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/9
NJD
CHI
Off the rush
3 G on 32 · 3.07 xG
3 G on 24 · 2.28 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 0.35 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.04 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 2-for-41, CHI 0-for-16. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Nemec
#17 · D · NJD
3 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 26:27 TOI · +4
J. Hughes
#86 · C · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 23:29 TOI · +3
L. Crevier
#46 · D · CHI
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 18:00 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NJD couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • NJD created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • S. Knight was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NJD at CHI · 9:30 PM ET

Devils at Blackhawks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 3:40 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
NJD
Model favorite
54%
46%
NJD50CHI

NJD by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NJD 2.72.5 CHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NJD← edge
edge →CHI
50.0%5v5 xG%42.0%
51.0%Corsi%46.0%
2.45xGF / 602.17
2.50xGA / 602.94
1.66Goals for / gm1.84
2.23Goals against / gm2.41
0.971PDO — luck, not skill0.996

NJD holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.971 vs 0.996) says CHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.7–2.5 game with the Devils at 54% win probability. You're looking at the closest thing to a pick'em all season.

The Devils own the underlying play. They run 50.0% xG at 5v5 and 51.0% Corsi, exerting real territorial control. The Blackhawks sit at 42.0% xG and 46.0% Corsi—respectable for a visitor, but visibly in the weaker position. New Jersey should outshoot Chicago over 60 minutes.

What keeps this tight is process versus results. The Devils' PDO of 0.971 signals they're running cold—a gap from average built to close. The Blackhawks' 0.996 PDO is exactly league average, which means their record is tracking their underlying skill. That variance gap tightens the projection.

The Blackhawks land the rest advantage: three days to New Jersey's one. It's not decisive, but it's real.

Goaltending matters here. J. Markstrom plays on a back-to-back—watch for a backup start or a starter running on empty. A fresh blade in the crease flips the variance calc considerably.

New Jersey's attack rests on two wings operating at different altitudes. Timo Meier runs 1.08 xG/60 with 13 goals and 15 assists; he's posted 3 high-danger goals at a 6.7% shooting rate, slightly cool. Jack Hughes sits at 0.88 xG/60, 18 goals, 17 assists, and has buried 1 high-danger goal at an 11.5% clip—hot enough to matter. Chicago counters with Tyler Bertuzzi (0.85 xG/60, 20 goals, 15 assists, 7 high-danger goals, 18.0% shooting) and Connor Bedard (0.82 xG/60, 17 goals, 27 assists, 5 high-danger goals, 11.8% shooting). Bertuzzi is the more efficient finisher in this pairing. Bedard has produced 27 assists, a reliable playmaking element for Chicago's offense.

Where each team bleeds is predictable. New Jersey's back line has Johnathan Kovacevic as a weak link. Chicago's is Anton Frondell. Both are defensive liabilities that a sharp counterattack can exploit.

This game has skill distributed evenly enough that the outcome genuinely could go either way. Take 54% Devils if you trust underlying process. Take the Blackhawks if you believe one day of rest and Markstrom's potential fatigue matter more than 8 percentage points of xG difference.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters