Kings run the Maple Leafs off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Kings won 4-3 in overtime, but the scoreboard tells a gentler story than the underlying numbers. Los Angeles controlled 68% of 5v5 expected goals (4.91–2.30), and the gap in shot attempts was even wider: Toronto managed just 15 to the Kings' 37.
What kept it close was goaltending. D. Hildeby (TOR) turned in 33 of 37 saves for a 0.892 save percentage that outperformed expectation by 0.91 goals. At the other end, D. Kuemper (LAK) posted 0.800 (12 of 15) and underperformed by 0.70. Together, those performances explain why a dominant Kings team needed overtime to finish.
Toronto was sharp on the rush: 2 goals on 16 chances. Los Angeles was less precise but higher volume: 3 goals on 40 rush attempts. High-danger chances finished 7–6 in Los Angeles's favor, reflecting the structural advantage they built over sixty minutes.
Quinton Byfield settled it at 00:35 of overtime with a slap shot from the top of the circles.
The danger ladder
LAK went 1-for-7 from high danger on 1.64 expected goals — 0.6 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
LAK finished -0.9 against expected, TOR +0.7 — D. Hildeby (TOR) saved 0.9 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: LAK went 2-for-32, TOR 2-for-18. LAK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- TOR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 16 rush chances.
- LAK was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 40 rush chances.
- LAK created 9 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.