Backcheck
Recap · OTT at ANA

Senators run the Ducks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 5:01 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
Home
ANA
Anaheim Ducks
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.37Expected goals2.53
63% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)25
6High-danger chances4
61Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 52% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Ottawa dominated on every underlying metric — 63% of expected goals (4.37–2.53), 0.072 xG per shot against Anaheim's 0.047 — yet barely won 3–2. The Senators went 0-for-6 on high-danger chances. That margin of error nearly didn't exist.

Anaheim converted 2 of 4 high-danger chances (50%), staying afloat despite the underlying onslaught. P. Mrazek stopped all six of Ottawa's high-danger chances and finished 22-for-25 (0.880 SV%, +1.37 vs expected). One exceptional goaltending performance prevented a larger margin of victory.

Drake Batherson's tip-in from the slot (P3, 18:02) proved decisive. L. Ullmark (23/25, 0.920 SV%, +0.53 vs expected) was steady in return. Ottawa's edge was on transition — two goals on 24 rush attempts, plus three rebound chances created. Anaheim also generated three rebounds and converted one, but the volume difference was stark.

The shot attempts finished even at 25–25, but Ottawa's chances were superior in texture: 0.072 xG per shot versus 0.047. Ottawa dominated high-danger territory with six prime looks to Anaheim's four. The Senators' inability to finish most of those chances left them vulnerable.

J. Sanderson led Ottawa with 1 assist over 24:16, while S. Pinto scored in 19:36. For Anaheim, T. Terry recorded 1 assist in 19:47, nearly stealing a win against an opponent that controlled the game.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT0 / 6 · 1.78 xG
ANA2 / 4 · 0.86 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT3 / 18 · 2.16 xG
ANA0 / 11 · 1.12 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT0 / 37 · 0.44 xG
ANA0 / 39 · 0.55 xG

OTT went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.78 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
3 G · 4.37 xG · -1.4
ANA
2 G · 2.53 xG · -0.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. UllmarkOTT
+0.5
P. MrazekANA
+1.4

OTT finished -1.4 against expected, ANA -0.5 — P. Mrazek (ANA) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
WRIST1/15
SNAP0/7
SLAP1/10
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/21
ANA
WRIST2/18
SNAP0/12
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/11
OTT
ANA
Off the rush
2 G on 24 · 2.44 xG
1 G on 29 · 1.61 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.41 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.66 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 1-for-15, ANA 2-for-18. OTT scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Sanderson
#85 · D · OTT
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 24:16 TOI
T. Terry
#19 · R · ANA
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:47 TOI
S. Pinto
#12 · C · OTT
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 19:36 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • ANA had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • P. Mrazek (ANA) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • OTT had the higher quality looks — 0.072 xG/shot vs 0.047.
  • ANA was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/4 on HD chances (50%).
  • OTT couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • ANA created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • P. Mrazek was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at ANA · 10:00 PM ET

Senators at Ducks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 5:00 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
OTT
Model favorite
51%
49%
OTT50ANA

OTT by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score OTT 2.62.6 ANA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →ANA
56.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
53.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.66xGF / 602.80
2.12xGA / 602.59
2.18Goals for / gm2.09
1.99Goals against / gm2.32
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.981

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.981) says OTT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6-2.6 game with the Senators at 51% win probability. This is functionally a pick'em.

Ottawa owns the underlying play. The Senators control 56.0% of expected goals at 5v5 versus Anaheim's 52.0%, and lead 53.0% to 52.0% in Corsi%. That dominance in shot quality and volume should compound over time.

But Anaheim is overdue. The Ducks' PDO of 0.981 sits below Ottawa's 0.993, meaning they've been unlucky on bounces and finished chances. Positive regression is plausible.

Rest favors the visitors. The Ducks arrive on 2 days of rest; the Senators on 4. That edge typically helps road teams control pace.

Ottawa's attack revolves around Brady Tkachuk, who generates 1.19 expected goals per 60 minutes and has recorded 11 goals and 20 assists with 2 high-danger chances. His 7.5% shooting rate sits below his historical mark, suggesting room for normalization. Dylan Cozens provides secondary firepower at 1.00 xG/60 with 13 goals, 15 assists, and a 9.5% shooting percentage.

Anaheim counters with Beckett Sennecke and Cutter Gauthier. Sennecke has converted 1.03 xG/60 into 20 goals and 19 assists, posting a 13.5% conversion rate and 8 high-danger goals. Gauthier operates at nearly identical underlying volume—0.99 xG/60—but has been far more prolific: 25 goals, 16 assists, 12.9% conversion rate, 2 high-danger goals. Both are long-term talent running at or slightly below their expected output rate.

The structural tension is the entire game. Ottawa should dominate possession and shots. Anaheim might dominate the scoreboard anyway. The Senators' play quality versus the Ducks' personnel and overdue luck creates a genuine toss-up.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
ANA
Beckett Sennecke20G 19A
1.03 xG/60 · 8 HD · 13.5% sh
Cutter Gauthier25G 16A
0.99 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters