Backcheck
Recap · LAK at SJS

Sharks edge the Kings in a shootout

The Sharks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.47–3.84 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 5:05 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
3
Home
SJS
San Jose Sharks
4
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.47Expected goals3.84
54% share for the better side
34Shot attempts (SOG)24
8High-danger chances10
82Corsi (all attempts)47
Score-adjusted: 66% / 34%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Sharks won 4–3 in a shootout despite the expected-goals disadvantage. Los Angeles generated 4.47 xG to San Jose's 3.84, but the Kings underperformed by 1.47 goals.

San Jose's offense was quieter but sharper. The Sharks held 41% of shot attempts (24 to 34 on goal) and generated 0.082 xG per shot versus Los Angeles's 0.055—a quality gap producing 10 high-danger chances to the Kings' 8. The Sharks converted none of them: 0 for 10 on those looks.

Y. Askarov stopped 31 of 34 shots (0.912 SV%), beating expected performance by 1.47 goals. A. Forsberg kept Los Angeles in it with perfect execution on high-danger chances (10 of 10 saves) but finished 21 for 24 overall (0.875 SV%), 0.84 above expected. Askarov's extra margin made the difference in a close game.

On the rush, San Jose was efficient: 3 goals on 22 chances. Los Angeles managed 2 on 36—volume without accuracy.

Philipp Kurashev's wrist shot from the high slot settled the shootout.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK2 / 8 · 1.91 xG
SJS0 / 10 · 2.25 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK1 / 15 · 1.65 xG
SJS2 / 8 · 1.04 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK0 / 59 · 0.91 xG
SJS1 / 29 · 0.55 xG

SJS went 0-for-10 from high danger on 2.25 expected goals — 2.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
3 G · 4.47 xG · -1.5
SJS
4 G · 3.84 xG · +0.2
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. ForsbergLAK
+0.8
Y. AskarovSJS
+1.5

LAK finished -1.5 against expected, SJS +0.2 — Y. Askarov (SJS) saved 1.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
WRIST2/32
SLAP0/11
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND1/4
SNAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
OTHER0/27
SJS
WRIST2/21
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/2
SNAP0/4
DEFLECTED1/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
OTHER0/10
LAK
SJS
Off the rush
2 G on 36 · 3.38 xG
3 G on 22 · 2.72 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.04 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.72 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: LAK went 2-for-32, SJS 2-for-21. SJS scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Kopitar
#11 · C · LAK
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 20:31 TOI · +1
C. Graf
#51 · R · SJS
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 14:32 TOI
T. Dellandrea
#10 · C · SJS
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 13:37 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • Y. Askarov (SJS) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 18 high-danger chances combined (SJS 10, LAK 8).
  • SJS generated far more dangerous chances — 0.082 xG/shot vs 0.055. Quality over quantity.
  • SJS couldn't convert — 0/10 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • SJS was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • SJS created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • A. Forsberg was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 10 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at SJS · 10:00 PM ET

Kings at Sharks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 5:02 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
LAK
Model favorite
52%
48%
LAK50SJS

LAK by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score LAK 2.52.4 SJS; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →SJS
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
52.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.42xGF / 602.33
2.20xGA / 602.56
1.85Goals for / gm1.99
1.71Goals against / gm2.32
1.002PDO — luck, not skill0.998

LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 0.998) says LAK has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.4 Kings victory with Los Angeles at 52% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The Kings own the underlying play. They hold 52.0% expected goals share at 5v5 and 52.0% Corsi, suggesting they'll tilt the territorial balance—the Sharks will spend the night defending.

San Jose isn't being run off the ice, though. At 48.0% xG and 47.0% Corsi, the Sharks have tightened the margins. PDO readings—Los Angeles at 1.002, San Jose at 0.998—suggest neither team has luck on its side. The tighter the underlying metrics, the tighter the final score.

Y. Askarov is on a back-to-back; watch for a backup or a tired starter.

Personnel availability matters more. Pavol Regenda is marked inactive but was shooting at a 16.1% clip with 5 goals on 1.10 xG/60—elite finishing. Without him, San Jose loses its most dangerous player. Alex Laferriere carries 16 goals and 18 assists on 0.87 xG/60, but his 9.9% shooting rate suggests he's due for a breakout; two percentage points of reversion and he's a pace-setter. Igor Chernyshov provides San Jose secondary scoring with 6 goals, 8 assists, 0.91 xG/60, and 15.0% shooting.

Jared Wright has 0 goals on 4 assists at 0.83 xG/60—creating without finishing.

This is a game where territory favors Los Angeles but San Jose's efficiency could steal one. Neither team has converted chances into enough volume to dominate. Pick the Kings for underlying play; pick the Sharks if Askarov is sharp and Regenda's absence opens ice for Chernyshov.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters