Backcheck
Recap · STL at NYR

Rangers hold off the Blues

The Rangers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 5:29 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
2
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.36Expected goals2.48
51% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)21
4High-danger chances5
51Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 50% / 51%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Rangers beat the Blues 3–2 on identical shot counts—21 each—which means New York won by making their chances count more effectively than St. Louis. Expected goals reinforced how tight the game actually was: Rangers 2.48, Blues 2.36, a split suggesting the underlying shot quality favored New York only marginally.

The goaltending gap explained most of it. I. Shesterkin posted a 0.905 SV% (19 saves on 21 shots), while J. Hofer finished at 0.857 SV% with 18 saves, underperforming his expected result by 0.52 goals—the margin that cost St. Louis the win.

But the real separation came from rush play. The Rangers converted 3 of 19 rush attempts; St. Louis converted 2 of 20. That efficiency edge in transition is what carried New York despite the even underlying metrics. Brayden Schenn's doorstep wrist shot in the third made it close, but not close enough.

V. Gavrikov supplied two assists across 26:09, anchoring the Rangers' defense. A. Fox added two assists in 24:00. The Blues got one assist from J. Faulk (24:11).

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL1 / 4 · 0.85 xG
NYR1 / 5 · 1.28 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL0 / 9 · 1.09 xG
NYR2 / 8 · 0.78 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL1 / 38 · 0.41 xG
NYR0 / 41 · 0.42 xG

NYR went 2-for-8 from medium danger on 0.78 expected goals — 1.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
2 G · 2.36 xG · -0.4
NYR
3 G · 2.48 xG · +0.5
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. HoferSTL
-0.5
I. ShesterkinNYR
+0.4

STL finished -0.4 against expected, NYR +0.5 — J. Hofer (STL) allowed 0.5 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
WRIST1/15
SNAP1/11
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/20
NYR
WRIST2/18
SNAP0/7
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED1/2
TIP IN0/1
BACKHAND0/1
OTHER0/21
STL
NYR
Off the rush
2 G on 20 · 1.77 xG
3 G on 19 · 1.60 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.44 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.20 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 1-for-15, NYR 2-for-18. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
V. Gavrikov
#44 · D · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 26:09 TOI · +2
A. Fox
#23 · D · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 24:00 TOI · +2
J. Faulk
#72 · D · STL
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 24:11 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 19 rush chances.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Blues at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 5:28 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NYR
Model favorite
49%
51%
STL50NYR

NYR by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score STL 2.42.5 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →NYR
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.34xGF / 602.26
2.40xGA / 602.40
2.00Goals for / gm1.88
2.12Goals against / gm1.90
1.000PDO — luck, not skill1.009

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.000 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.5 goal game with the Rangers favored at 51%—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The Blues enter with a minus-6 goal differential over their last ten games. Yet the underlying metrics suggest evenness. At five-on-five, the numbers are nearly identical: St. Louis 49.0% xG%, 48.0% Corsi%; New York 48.0% xG%, 49.0% Corsi%.

The Rangers' PDO sits at 1.009 to St. Louis's 1.000, a modest luck advantage that only partly explains the win-probability gap. This is a near-toss-up at process.

Watch the high-end talent. Jimmy Snuggerud (15 goals, 0.86 xG/60, 11.9% shooting) drives St. Louis's attack; Dylan Holloway supplies secondary scoring at 0.82 xG/60 with 13 goals and 10.8% shooting. For New York, Adam Sykora registers 0.91 xG/60 with three goals and 20.0% shooting, while Gabe Perreault has eight goals and two high-danger goals from 0.79 xG/60 with 13.1% shooting.

Goaltending wrinkle: J. Quick faces a back-to-back, creating uncertainty around whether St. Louis starts him or turns to a backup.

Both teams have recorded 0% high-danger and rebound-goal rates; all scoring flows from primary chances and direct play. Defensively, both teams have weak points: Snuggerud for St. Louis, Vincent Iorio for the Rangers. In a margin-of-error game, these matter.

This projection reflects what the data says: two indistinguishable teams separated by the Rangers' modest luck and St. Louis's recent fatigue. Bet accordingly.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters