Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at WSH

Capitals pull away from the Blue Jackets

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 5:30 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
1
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.91Expected goals3.44
54% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)31
5High-danger chances3
51Corsi (all attempts)56
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

L. Thompson's performance explained the gap: Washington's 5–1 victory looked decisive but sat atop underlying metrics that suggested a closer contest. Expected goals gave the Capitals barely a 54–46 edge (3.44–2.91), yet the final margin was four.

The Capitals dominated shot volume, controlling 57% of attempts (31–23 on goal). They converted low-danger chances at rates that punished the opposing goalkeeper—two goals from spots E. Merzlikins should have closed out. Washington was also lethal in transition, scoring twice on 26 rush chances.

But the true separation lived in net. L. Thompson saved 1.9 goals above expected, converting a close underlying contest into a rout. E. Merzlikins surrendered 1.6 more than his workload warranted—an uncharacteristic poor outing for the otherwise reliable Columbus starter. The Blue Jackets generated five high-danger chances to Washington's three, yet scored once. Quality wasted.

J. Chychrun led the way with two goals in 24:54, while J. Carlson (1G, 1A in 19:41) and T. Wilson (1G, 1A in 17:39) added support. The three combined for four of Washington's five goals.

Columbus never recovered. The Blue Jackets' defeat wasn't about being outhustled—it was about variance compounding: out-shot, out-goaltended, and unable to convert the quality chances they did generate.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ1 / 5 · 1.20 xG
WSH0 / 3 · 0.74 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ0 / 10 · 1.22 xG
WSH3 / 19 · 1.97 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 36 · 0.48 xG
WSH2 / 34 · 0.74 xG

WSH went 2-for-34 from low danger on 0.74 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
1 G · 2.91 xG · -1.9
WSH
5 G · 3.44 xG · +1.6
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
E. MerzlikinsCBJ
-1.6
L. ThompsonWSH
+1.9

CBJ finished -1.9 against expected, WSH +1.6 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
SNAP1/22
SLAP0/7
WRIST0/1
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/2
OTHER0/15
WSH
SNAP2/23
SLAP2/9
WRIST1/9
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/2
OTHER0/10
CBJ
WSH
Off the rush
0 G on 23 · 1.33 xG
2 G on 26 · 2.07 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 8 · 1.49 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.73 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: CBJ went 1-for-22, WSH 2-for-23. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Chychrun
#6 · D · WSH
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 24:54 TOI · +1
J. Carlson
#74 · D · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 19:41 TOI · +3
T. Wilson
#43 · R · WSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:39 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • E. Merzlikins (CBJ) gave up 1.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • WSH scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • WSH created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ created 8 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH outperformed their expected goals by 1.6 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • CBJ underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Capitals: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 5:32 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
WSH
Model favorite
50%
50%
CBJ50WSH

WSH by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.62.7 WSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →WSH
52.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
51.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.63xGF / 602.62
2.43xGA / 602.62
2.12Goals for / gm2.18
1.98Goals against / gm1.79
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.018

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a CBJ 2.6–2.7 WSH game, making the Capitals precisely a 50% win probability—a pick'em with no lean.

Columbus shows structural superiority in underlying metrics: 52.0% expected goals and 51.0% Corsi. Yet they're -7 in goal differential over their last ten games, evidence that results lag underlying play. Washington counters with a 1.018 PDO that defies long-term sustainability; expect regression to pull the Capitals back.

C. Lindgren starts on a back-to-back. Watch whether the workload eases into a backup appearance or fatigue shows.

Boone Jenner leads Columbus with 11 goals, 21 assists, 0.98 xG/60, and 9.6% shooting. Mathieu Olivier follows with 12 goals and 13.3% shooting. Alex Ovechkin leads Washington with 19 goals, 17 assists, 0.97 xG/60, and 13.8% shooting. Anthony Beauvillier adds 14 goals at 10.4% shooting.

Defensively, Conor Garland represents Columbus's weakness; Declan Chisholm's play invites risk for Washington. The underlying metrics split this game evenly. Columbus's possession edge masks a team whose scoresheet lags its play; Washington's inflated PDO marks a team due for regression. Lindgren's fitness is the sole tactical variable. Absent injury, this stays a pick'em.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters