Backcheck
Recap · FLA at UTA

Panthers hold off the Mammoth

The Panthers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:56 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
FLA
Florida Panthers
4
Home
UTA
Utah Mammoth
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.17Expected goals3.47
60% share for the better side
36Shot attempts (SOG)30
8High-danger chances6
81Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 57% / 43%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Florida won 4-3, but the underlying story was a Panthers blowout waiting to happen. They controlled 60% of 5v5 expected goals (5.17 to 3.47), yet the Mammoth stayed within a goal only because K. Vejmelka saved 1.17 goals above expected—an exceptional save rate that compressed Florida's advantage into a tight final score.

The shot metrics reinforce the disparity. Utah held 46% of shot attempts (30 to 36), yet Florida still had to work to pull away. Vejmelka's 0.889 save percentage (32 of 36) took what should have been a convincing Panthers victory and made it competitive. When a goalie outperforms his expected save percentage by that margin, it overwrites the game's underlying structure.

Florida created better chances at every level. High-danger opportunities went 8 to 6, and they scored three goals on 36 rush chances while Utah managed two on 26. Both teams generated eight rebound opportunities with one conversion each, but the Panthers' volume advantage told the story—they found scoring chances through multiple avenues.

S. Bennett (FLA) led with 2 goals and 1 assist in 17:52. J. Marino (UTA) recorded 2 assists in 22:02, while D. Guenther (UTA) scored twice in 16:32. S. Bobrovsky (FLA) made 27 saves on 30 shots (0.900 SV%), but Vejmelka's night stole the spotlight.

Utah came remarkably close to stealing a win their chances didn't warrant. Vejmelka's overperformance kept the Mammoth competitive, but Florida's superior shot quality and volume proved decisive.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
FLA1 / 8 · 2.14 xG
UTA1 / 6 · 1.52 xG
Medium dangermid-range
FLA3 / 16 · 1.73 xG
UTA2 / 11 · 1.38 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
FLA0 / 57 · 1.29 xG
UTA0 / 43 · 0.57 xG

FLA went 0-for-57 from low danger on 1.29 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
FLA
4 G · 5.17 xG · -1.2
UTA
3 G · 3.47 xG · -0.5
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. BobrovskyFLA
+0.5
K. VejmelkaUTA
+1.2

FLA finished -1.2 against expected, UTA -0.5 — K. Vejmelka (UTA) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
FLA
SNAP2/31
WRIST2/13
SLAP0/8
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/4
DEFLECTED0/2
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
OTHER0/16
UTA
SNAP1/23
WRIST0/6
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND2/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
OTHER0/17
FLA
UTA
Off the rush
3 G on 36 · 2.28 xG
2 G on 26 · 2.38 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 8 · 1.45 xG
1 G on 8 · 0.98 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: FLA went 2-for-31, UTA 1-for-23. FLA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
S. Bennett
#9 · C · FLA
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 17:52 TOI · +1
J. Marino
#6 · D · UTA
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 22:02 TOI · +1
D. Guenther
#11 · R · UTA
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 16:32 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • K. Vejmelka (UTA) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • UTA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • FLA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • UTA created 8 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • FLA created 8 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · FLA at UTA · 9:00 PM ET

Panthers at Mammoth: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:46 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
UTA
Model favorite
45%
55%
FLA50UTA

UTA by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score FLA 2.42.7 UTA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

FLA← edge
edge →UTA
49.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
52.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.48xGF / 602.64
2.56xGA / 602.39
1.98Goals for / gm2.26
2.21Goals against / gm1.99
0.989PDO — luck, not skill1.003

UTA holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.989 vs 1.003) says UTA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Utah comes in at 55% win probability, a spread so tight the pregame models offer no edge. The Mammoth project to a 2.4-2.7 goal range—essentially even.

On underlying play, Utah owns the advantage. The Mammoth carry a 52.0% expected goals share against Florida's 49.0%, a real if modest edge. Their Corsi% sits at 53.0% versus the Panthers' 52.0%, and Utah's PDO of 1.003 suggests they've benefited from slightly better finishing luck than Florida's 0.989.

Florida has a rest advantage worth noting: Utah arrives on one day off, Florida on three. That edge narrows when K. Vejmelka plays on a back-to-back, a situation that could pull Utah toward a backup start or extract a performance cost from their starter.

The matchup hinges on two scoring engines. Sam Bennett powers Florida at 0.97 expected goals per sixty with 18 goals and 19 assists, including six from high-danger areas and a 13.1% shooting rate. Brad Marchand carries 0.93 xG/60 with 17 goals, 9 assists, and three high-danger markers, though his 19.5% shooting percentage suggests unsustainable finish—and marks him as Florida's defensive liability if Utah can locate him.

Utah counters with Dylan Guenther at 1.02 xG/60, 28 goals, 15 assists, and three high-danger markers. Daniil But registers at 1.01 xG/60 despite just 2 goals and 2 assists and a 5.6% shooting rate, yet his single high-danger goal signals latent danger.

Neither team converts high-danger chances at an elevated rate. Utah needs to neutralize Bennett; Florida must contain Guenther. Utah's marginal edge in possession, Florida's rest advantage, and Vejmelka's durability represent the deciding factors. This is about as close to a genuine toss-up as the preseason numbers project.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
UTA
Dylan Guenther28G 15A
1.02 xG/60 · 3 HD · 16.8% sh
Daniil But2G 2A
1.01 xG/60 · 1 HD · 5.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters