Backcheck
Recap · LAK at SEA

Kraken edge the Kings in overtime

The Kraken won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:52 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
2
Home
SEA
Seattle Kraken
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.30Expected goals4.04
52% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)33
8High-danger chances6
60Corsi (all attempts)71
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Kraken won 3-2 in overtime, but the Kings dominated the underlying numbers. Expected goals split 4.04-4.30 (a slight edge to the Kings), and high-danger chances went 6-8 in LA's favor. J. Daccord stole the result—he saved 2.30 goals above expected, while LA underperformed their xG by the same 2.30, wasting quality chances they created.

The Kraken controlled possession, holding 56% of shot attempts (33-26 on goal), but for most of the game, LA's metrics suggested they had the edge. That changed in overtime. V. Dunn's slap shot from the top of the circles at 01:21 gave Seattle the win—the deciding goal in a game the underlying numbers said should've gone either way.

A. Forsberg was outstanding on high-danger chances, stopping all 6 the Kraken threw at him. It wasn't enough. The Kings scored 2 goals on their 30 rush chances; Seattle matched that efficiency on 34 rush attempts. The difference came elsewhere—the Kraken power play was devastating, converting 3 goals on 23 PP shots.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK2 / 8 · 2.29 xG
SEA0 / 6 · 1.75 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK0 / 12 · 1.42 xG
SEA3 / 12 · 1.41 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK0 / 40 · 0.58 xG
SEA0 / 53 · 0.87 xG

SEA went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.75 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
2 G · 4.30 xG · -2.3
SEA
3 G · 4.04 xG · -1.0
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. ForsbergLAK
+1.0
J. DaccordSEA
+2.3

LAK finished -2.3 against expected, SEA -1.0 — J. Daccord (SEA) saved 2.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
WRIST0/25
SNAP0/8
BACKHAND2/5
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
SEA
WRIST0/19
SNAP0/11
BACKHAND0/6
SLAP2/8
TIP IN1/3
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/1
OTHER0/21
LAK
SEA
Off the rush
2 G on 30 · 2.38 xG
2 G on 34 · 3.20 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.36 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.05 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: LAK went 0-for-25, SEA 0-for-19. LAK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
V. Dunn
#29 · D · SEA
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 21:29 TOI
E. Tolvanen
#20 · R · SEA
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 17:54 TOI · -1
A. Kopitar
#11 · C · LAK
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:43 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
  • SEA couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 34 rush chances.
  • LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 2.3 — wasted quality chances.
  • A. Forsberg was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
  • J. Daccord (SEA) saved 2.3 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • SEA power play was dominant — 3 PPG on 23 PP shots (2.78 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at SEA · 10:00 PM ET

Kings at Kraken: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:48 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
LAK
Model favorite
53%
47%
LAK50SEA

LAK by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score LAK 2.52.3 SEA; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →SEA
52.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
52.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.42xGF / 602.13
2.20xGA / 602.51
1.85Goals for / gm1.87
1.71Goals against / gm1.95
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.011

LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.011) says SEA has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.5–2.3 Kings win with Los Angeles at 53% probability—as close to a pick'em as exists.

Los Angeles is the hotter team on points pace, posting a 4-3-3 record over their last ten games. Seattle is underwater at -12 goal differential in that same span. The gap in underlying play is smaller than the form suggests: LAK owns 52.0% xG at 5v5, implying territorial dominance, while SEA sits at 46.0%. Corsi tells the same story—52.0% to 45.0%—expect a Kings team that controls puck movement. What tightens this matchup is PDO variance: Los Angeles is at 1.002, nearly average, while Seattle is at 1.011, a small but real mark that the Kraken are benefiting from shooting luck or goaltending overperformance. Neither will sustain it.

Both goaltenders are on back-to-backs. P. Grubauer and D. Kuemper could see backups or fatigued starters—a wild card that cuts both ways.

Alex Laferriere is LAK's engine at 0.87 xG/60, with 16 goals and 18 assists. His 2 high-danger goals and 9.9% shooting rate tell you the scoring is real, not luck-driven. Jared Wright trails at 0.83 xG/60 with 0 goals and 4 assists, suggesting secondary-line usage or sheltered deployment. For Seattle, Shane Wright runs at 0.77 xG/60 with 8 goals and 10 assists. His 4 high-danger goals and 10.4% shooting mark him as a finisher, not a volume scorer. Berkly Catton is lower-volume at 0.68 xG/60 but efficient: 6 goals, 8 assists, 5 high-danger goals at 8.8% shooting—a player tilting toward danger.

The tactical edges cut both ways. LAK's defensive liability is Adrian Kempe; Seattle's is Chandler Stephenson. Each team will probe those weaknesses. Los Angeles should win the territorial battle and force shooting from distance. Seattle will need to finish what chances it generates.

There's no hidden skew here: two teams close enough that a bounce or a goalie decision swings the night either way.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters