Backcheck
Recap · VAN at PHI

Flyers run the Canucks off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:43 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
VAN
Vancouver Canucks
2
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.10Expected goals6.17
67% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)39
8High-danger chances15
52Corsi (all attempts)68
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

T. Demko stopped 2.2 goals above expected, yet still lost 5–2. The gap in underlying numbers proved too wide for any goaltending to overcome.

The Flyers dominated at 5v5: 67% of expected goals (6.17–3.10), 61% of shot attempts, and far superior shot quality. Their chances averaged 0.091 expected goals per shot to Vancouver's 0.060. Philadelphia converted 3 of 34 rush attempts into goals; Vancouver converted 2 of 23.

High-danger chances ran 15–8 in Philadelphia's favor. Both teams underperformed their expected goals—the Flyers by 1.17, Vancouver by 1.10—but that math barely narrowed the gap. Philadelphia's goalie D. Vladar exceeded expectations by 1.10, but Demko's 2.17 above expected proved insufficient against such lopsided metrics.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VAN2 / 8 · 1.90 xG
PHI4 / 15 · 4.25 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VAN0 / 7 · 0.76 xG
PHI1 / 15 · 1.47 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VAN0 / 37 · 0.45 xG
PHI0 / 38 · 0.46 xG

VAN went 0-for-7 from medium danger on 0.76 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VAN
2 G · 3.10 xG · -1.1
PHI
5 G · 6.17 xG · -1.2
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
T. DemkoVAN
+2.2
D. VladarPHI
+1.1

VAN finished -1.1 against expected, PHI -1.2 — T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VAN
SNAP1/8
WRIST1/20
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP0/3
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/13
PHI
SNAP2/26
WRIST1/8
TIP IN1/4
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP0/3
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/2
BAT1/1
OTHER0/19
VAN
PHI
Off the rush
2 G on 23 · 2.02 xG
3 G on 34 · 4.15 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.47 xG
1 G on 4 · 0.73 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: VAN went 1-for-8, PHI 2-for-26. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. Abols
#18 · C · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 14:07 TOI · +2
N. Grebenkin
#29 · R · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 12:16 TOI · +2
C. York
#8 · D · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 23:00 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • T. Demko (VAN) stopped 2.2 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 23 high-danger chances combined (PHI 15, VAN 8).
  • PHI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.091 xG/shot vs 0.060. Quality over quantity.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
  • VAN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • VAN created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • T. Demko (VAN) saved 2.2 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · VAN at PHI · 7:30 PM ET

The Flyers are the model's lean over the Canucks — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 9:30 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

58%
PHI
Model favorite
42%
58%
VAN50PHI

PHI by 16 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score VAN 2.22.7 PHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

VAN← edge
edge →PHI
44.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
46.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.22xGF / 602.26
2.81xGA / 602.20
1.60Goals for / gm1.96
2.56Goals against / gm1.82
0.974PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.974 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Philadelphia owns the underlying play. At 51.0% xG at 5v5, the Flyers significantly outpace Vancouver (44.0%), and the model weights this advantage heavily: 58% win probability for PHI, with a projected scoring band of 2.2 to 2.7 goals.

But the sharper angle is regression. Vancouver's 0.974 PDO indicates they're running cold—results are lagging their underlying chance generation. That cold streak typically breaks. Philadelphia's 1.008 PDO represents positive fortune unlikely to repeat. When both normalize, Vancouver's deficit shrinks.

The goaltending layer adds uncertainty. K. Lankinen is on a back-to-back, a situation that either means a backup takes the start or a starter plays through fatigue. Either scenario favors Philadelphia.

Vancouver's offense centers on Filip Chytil, who carries 1.03 xG/60 at a 15.0% shooting rate with 3 goals and 1 high-danger chance—a player in rhythm. Drew O'Connor (0.85 xG/60, 13 goals, 11.8% shooting) pairs goal-scoring with 11 assists, indicating secondary creation.

Philadelphia counters with Owen Tippett as the primary threat: 19 goals, 0.88 xG/60, 12.1% shooting, 2 high-danger chances. Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 11.2% shooting, 3 high-danger chances) supplies secondary output alongside 21 assists, indicating both scoring and facilitation.

Possession metrics (VAN 46.0% Corsi, PHI 48.0%) show a closer battle than shot quality suggests. Philadelphia's edge in both chance-volume and conversion efficiency compounds through each matchup.

The case for the Flyers isn't that Vancouver lacks talent. It's the gap between how they're running (unlucky: 0.974 PDO) and how Philadelphia is running (lucky: 1.008 PDO)—a spread that mean-reverts. Pair that with the underlying advantage in shot generation and the goaltending variable, and the model's 58% lean becomes clear.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

VAN
Filip Chytil3G 0A
1.03 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Drew O'Connor13G 11A
0.85 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.8% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters