Backcheck
Recap · NSH at MIN

Predators edge the Wild in overtime

The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 9:49 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NSH
Nashville Predators
3
Home
MIN
Minnesota Wild
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.28Expected goals2.92
53% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)32
2High-danger chances5
54Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 52% / 48%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Predators beat the Wild 3-2 in overtime despite Minnesota's territorial dominance. The Wild controlled 52% of shot attempts (32-29) and nearly matched expected goals (2.92-3.28), yet couldn't finish. Minnesota went 0-for-5 on high-danger chances while Nashville converted its opportunities.

The Wild won't waste chances like this often. They created the second-most dangerous looks on the ice and buried zero — all five high-danger attempts stopped by J. Saros, who posted a 0.938 save percentage, 0.92 goals better than expected. That overperformance explains Minnesota's 0.92-goal shortfall on expected goals: elite goaltending meets offensive futility, and the scoreboard suffers. F. Gustavsson (0.897 SV%) wasn't at fault; the skaters misfired.

The Predators were lethally efficient where it mattered. They scored twice on rush chances, converting a territorial disadvantage into a lead. Nashville's power play compounded the edge — two goals on 16 shots (1.26 xG) against a Minnesota unit with no margin for error. When Steven Stamkos tipped in the game-winner at 00:53 of overtime, Nashville had already decided the game through execution.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NSH0 / 2 · 0.58 xG
MIN0 / 5 · 1.22 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NSH2 / 19 · 2.11 xG
MIN1 / 11 · 1.23 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NSH1 / 33 · 0.59 xG
MIN1 / 35 · 0.48 xG

MIN went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.22 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NSH
3 G · 3.28 xG · -0.3
MIN
2 G · 2.92 xG · -0.9
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. SarosNSH
+0.9
F. GustavssonMIN
+0.3

NSH finished -0.3 against expected, MIN -0.9 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 0.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NSH
WRIST1/21
SLAP0/9
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND1/3
SNAP0/2
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/12
MIN
WRIST1/28
SLAP1/2
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/2
SNAP0/2
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/12
NSH
MIN
Off the rush
2 G on 28 · 2.48 xG
0 G on 23 · 2.07 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 1 · 0.10 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.39 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 1-for-21, MIN 1-for-28. NSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. O'Reilly
#90 · C · NSH
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 22:45 TOI · -2
S. Stamkos
#91 · C · NSH
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 18:24 TOI · -1
Q. Hughes
#43 · D · MIN
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 29:11 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • MIN couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • MIN created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Saros was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
  • NSH power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 16 PP shots (1.26 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NSH at MIN · 8:00 PM ET

Predators at Wild: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 9:47 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
MIN
Model favorite
46%
54%
NSH50MIN

MIN by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NSH 2.42.7 MIN; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NSH← edge
edge →MIN
49.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
50.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.48xGF / 602.55
2.58xGA / 602.40
1.84Goals for / gm2.04
2.21Goals against / gm1.93
0.992PDO — luck, not skill1.007

MIN holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.992 vs 1.007) says MIN has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This matchup is as close to even money as the model permits: the Wild project a 2.4-2.7 goal victory at 54% win probability—barely above a coin flip. Nashville and Minnesota are nearly identical in talent; the small edge belongs to Minnesota.

The Wild own the underlying play. They generate 52.0% expected goals at 5v5 to Nashville's 49.0%, yet both teams finish with bottom-tier shot quality—Corsi of 50.0% and 48.0%, respectively. Nashville's PDO sits at 0.992, Minnesota's at 1.007. Almost perfect parity.

Watch for J. Annunen. On a back-to-back, Nashville may pivot to a backup or lean on a tired starter. Goaltending depth becomes the game's hinge.

Nashville's attack centers on Zachary L'Heureux, who generates 0.85 expected goals per 60 and has converted at a 16.0% rate with 4 goals. Filip Forsberg offers volume at 0.80 xG/60 with 23 goals, though a 13.6% shooting percentage reveals he's both prolific and streaky. Minnesota counters with Matt Boldy, who leads this matchup at 0.89 xG/60 and has been cleaner at 13.7% conversion on 22 goals. Robby Fabbri (0.88 xG/60, 6.9% shooting) is likely out.

The matchup edges cut both ways. Nashville can exploit Minnesota's Matt Kiersted; Minnesota attacks through Jonathan Marchessault. Both teams have yet to record a high-danger or rebound goal all season. The Wild own the territorial and expected-goals advantage, but parity in shot quality and luck (PDO nearly identical) leaves the door open. Pick the team that breaks through on its first genuine scoring chance.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
MIN
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Robby Fabbri2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters