Flyers run the Blackhawks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Flyers won 3–1. High-danger chances told a larger story: the Flyers had nine to Chicago's two, a gap that dwarfed the scoreline.
Philadelphia controlled 60% of 5v5 expected goals (2.85–4.36 favoring the Flyers). They generated the higher-quality looks: 0.082 xG per shot versus Chicago's 0.053. The Blackhawks held 45% of shot attempts and ceded control in both volume and efficiency.
Chicago underperformed their xG by 1.85 goals; Philadelphia underperformed theirs by 1.36. Neither converted at their underlying rate, but the Flyers' dominance in chance creation proved decisive. Philadelphia was lethal on the rush, scoring 3 goals on 20 chances. Chicago converted zero rebound opportunities despite generating five.
S. Ersson (PHI) saved 1.85 goals above expected on 21 saves. S. Knight (CHI) posted +2.36, a showing that kept Chicago competitive in the underlying metrics. Carl Grundstrom's wrist shot from the high slot at 17:52 of the third period marked the turning point.
The danger ladder
CHI went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.61 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
PHI finished -1.4 against expected, CHI -1.9 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 2.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 2-for-23, CHI 1-for-19. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- S. Ersson (PHI) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
- PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.082 xG/shot vs 0.053.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 20 rush chances.
- CHI created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PHI created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CHI underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
- S. Ersson (PHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
- S. Knight (CHI) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.