Backcheck
Recap · CHI at WSH

Blackhawks edge the Capitals in a shootout

The Blackhawks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.45–3.90 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 11:06 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
3
Home
WSH
Washington Capitals
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.45Expected goals3.90
53% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)34
5High-danger chances6
61Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 48% / 52%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Chicago won a game that didn't belong to them. The Capitals generated 3.90 expected goals to the Blackhawks' 3.45—a 53-47 split that suggested a coin flip—but fell 3-2 in a shootout after S. Knight (CHI) saved 1.9 goals above expectation.

The Capitals created the better chances. They held 51% of shot attempts (34–33) and led 6–5 in high-danger opportunities. Yet they converted zero of those six HD chances, while Chicago cashed 2 goals on 28 rush attempts. That inefficiency—wasting quality—cost them the game more than the underlying play did.

S. Knight was the difference. He stopped every high-danger shot he faced, finishing with a 0.941 SV%, the kind of outlier performance that erases advantages in process. L. Thompson (WSH) also played well, posting a 0.939 SV%, but faced a shootout where Nick Foligno buried from the slot.

The Capitals' rebound work (5 created, 2 converted) showed effort. Chicago's rebound game was less productive (3 created, 0 converted), a gap that would normally doom them. But at even strength and overtime, this was decided at the margins: shot volume was even, quality was split, both goalies played above the line. The shootout was noise.

  • #17 D. Strome (WSH) — 1G in 21:12
  • #28 A. Burakovsky (CHI) — 1A in 20:37
  • #9 R. Leonard (WSH) — 1G in 20:21
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI1 / 5 · 1.38 xG
WSH0 / 6 · 1.45 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI1 / 14 · 1.53 xG
WSH2 / 15 · 1.81 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 42 · 0.55 xG
WSH0 / 39 · 0.65 xG

WSH went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.45 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
3 G · 3.45 xG · -0.5
WSH
2 G · 3.90 xG · -1.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. KnightCHI
+1.9
L. ThompsonWSH
+1.5

CHI finished -0.5 against expected, WSH -1.9 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
SNAP1/29
WRIST0/7
SLAP0/2
TIP IN1/1
BACKHAND0/2
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/19
WSH
SNAP1/29
WRIST0/3
SLAP0/6
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/3
BAT1/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
CHI
WSH
Off the rush
2 G on 28 · 2.45 xG
0 G on 29 · 2.95 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.38 xG
2 G on 5 · 0.78 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-29, WSH 1-for-29. CHI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Strome
#17 · C · WSH
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 21:12 TOI
A. Burakovsky
#28 · L · CHI
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 20:37 TOI · -1
R. Leonard
#9 · R · WSH
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 20:21 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Knight (CHI) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • WSH couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • CHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • WSH created 5 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Knight (CHI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • S. Knight was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at WSH · 7:00 PM ET

The Capitals are the model's lean over the Blackhawks — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 11, 11:05 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

59%
WSH
Model favorite
41%
59%
CHI50WSH

WSH by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score CHI 2.42.9 WSH; 17% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →WSH
42.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
46.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.17xGF / 602.62
2.94xGA / 602.62
1.84Goals for / gm2.18
2.41Goals against / gm1.79
0.996PDO — luck, not skill1.018

WSH holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 1.018) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.9 Washington victory with the Capitals favored at 59% win probability. Both teams are underwater: Chicago is -16 in goal differential over its last 10 games, Washington -12.

Washington dominates the underlying play. The Capitals own 50.0% of expected goals at 5v5 versus Chicago's 42.0%. They also lead in Corsi% 49.0% to 46.0%. This gap explains the model's lean.

Washington's PDO sits at 1.018—running hot on shot quality and conversion. Chicago's 0.996 signals regression looming for both sides.

S. Knight faces a back-to-back start, a potential fatigue factor in a tight game.

Chicago's offense centers on Tyler Bertuzzi and Connor Bedard. Bertuzzi carries a heavy shot load at 0.85 xG per 60, converting at 18.0% (20 goals, 15 assists) with 7 high-danger goals. Bedard runs at 0.82 xG/60 with 17 goals and 27 assists, though his 11.8% shooting rate flags regression ahead.

Washington counters with Alex Ovechkin, who leads in shot volume at 0.97 xG/60. His 19 goals and 17 assists include just 2 high-danger tallies, emphasizing his reliance on volume. Anthony Beauvillier adds 0.89 xG/60 with 14 goals and 9 assists, also limited to 2 high-danger goals.

Both teams show 0% high-danger goal rates and 0% rebound goal rates. Chicago's defensive weak link: Anton Frondell. Washington's: Declan Chisholm.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters