Rangers pull away from the Flyers
The Rangers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Rangers won 6-3 despite shot attempts splitting 28-28. New York controlled 56% of 5v5 expected goals (4.19-3.29). The difference was execution: the Rangers generated 0.069 expected goals per shot against Philadelphia's 0.051.
The Rangers overperformed their xG by 1.81 goals—elite shooting or lucky bounces. High-danger chances went 6-4 for New York.
Both teams scored on the rush, but New York was more efficient. Philadelphia scored 2 goals on 29 rush chances. New York scored 3 goals on 34 rush attempts. The Rangers created 4 rebound opportunities while crashing the net.
Philadelphia's goaltending was mixed. S. Martin (NYR) stopped 25 of 28 for a 0.893 SV%. S. Ersson posted a 0.880 SV% and outperformed expectations by 0.74 goals. A. Kolosov gave up 2.6 goals more than expected on limited work (0/3 saves, 0.000 SV%).
The danger ladder
NYR went 5-for-28 from medium danger on 2.92 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
NYR finished +1.8 against expected, PHI -0.3 — A. Kolosov (PHI) allowed 2.6 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Snap shots carried the volume: NYR went 5-for-34, PHI 2-for-14. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- A. Kolosov (PHI) gave up 2.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- NYR had the higher quality looks — 0.069 xG/shot vs 0.051.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
- NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
- NYR created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NYR outperformed their expected goals by 1.8 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.