Backcheck
Recap · NYR at PHI

Rangers pull away from the Flyers

The Rangers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 1:07 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
6
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.19Expected goals3.29
56% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)28
4High-danger chances6
61Corsi (all attempts)65
Score-adjusted: 41% / 59%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Rangers won 6-3 despite shot attempts splitting 28-28. New York controlled 56% of 5v5 expected goals (4.19-3.29). The difference was execution: the Rangers generated 0.069 expected goals per shot against Philadelphia's 0.051.

The Rangers overperformed their xG by 1.81 goals—elite shooting or lucky bounces. High-danger chances went 6-4 for New York.

Both teams scored on the rush, but New York was more efficient. Philadelphia scored 2 goals on 29 rush chances. New York scored 3 goals on 34 rush attempts. The Rangers created 4 rebound opportunities while crashing the net.

Philadelphia's goaltending was mixed. S. Martin (NYR) stopped 25 of 28 for a 0.893 SV%. S. Ersson posted a 0.880 SV% and outperformed expectations by 0.74 goals. A. Kolosov gave up 2.6 goals more than expected on limited work (0/3 saves, 0.000 SV%).

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 4 · 0.91 xG
PHI1 / 6 · 1.33 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR5 / 28 · 2.92 xG
PHI1 / 13 · 1.33 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 29 · 0.37 xG
PHI1 / 46 · 0.63 xG

NYR went 5-for-28 from medium danger on 2.92 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
6 G · 4.19 xG · +1.8
PHI
3 G · 3.29 xG · -0.3
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. MartinNYR
+0.3
S. ErssonPHI
+0.7
A. KolosovPHI
-2.6

NYR finished +1.8 against expected, PHI -0.3 — A. Kolosov (PHI) allowed 2.6 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
SNAP5/34
WRIST1/3
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/13
PHI
SNAP2/14
WRIST1/19
TIP IN0/2
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/5
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/22
NYR
PHI
Off the rush
3 G on 34 · 3.05 xG
2 G on 29 · 2.52 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.76 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.17 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYR went 5-for-34, PHI 2-for-14. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Panarin
#10 · L · NYR
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 20:56 TOI
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
3 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 20:02 TOI
T. Sanheim
#6 · D · PHI
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 24:00 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Kolosov (PHI) gave up 2.6 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NYR had the higher quality looks — 0.069 xG/shot vs 0.051.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
  • NYR created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR outperformed their expected goals by 1.8 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at PHI · 1:00 PM ET

Rangers at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 1:05 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
PHI
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYR50PHI

PHI by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.22.5 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →PHI
48.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.26xGF / 602.26
2.40xGA / 602.20
1.88Goals for / gm1.96
1.90Goals against / gm1.82
1.009PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 1.008) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a NYR 2.2 - 2.5 PHI game with the Flyers at 54% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Philadelphia owns the underlying play. At 5v5, the Flyers generate 51.0% of expected goals to New York's 48.0%—a meaningful edge in shot quality that typically translates to wins over time. Possession is nearly even: Corsi% sits at NYR 49.0% versus PHI 48.0%. Shooting luck is nearly identical—NYR 1.009 PDO, PHI 1.008 PDO.

The difference comes down to four skaters. Adam Sykora (3G 1A, 0.91 xG/60, 20.0% shooting) and Gabe Perreault (8G 11A, 0.79 xG/60, 2 HD goals, 13.1% shooting) anchor New York's offense. Philadelphia counters with Owen Tippett (19G 18A, 0.88 xG/60, 2 HD goals, 12.1% shooting) and Christian Dvorak (12G 21A, 0.81 xG/60, 3 HD goals, 11.2% shooting).

Both teams finish at identical rates: 0% on high-danger chances, 0% on rebounds. Defense becomes the swing factor. Vincent Iorio is New York's weak link. Dvorak serves that role for Philadelphia. In a game this tight, marginal edges compound.

The 54% edge for Philadelphia isn't a ringing endorsement. It reflects a game that could flip on a single bounce. This is a coin flip that happens to land heads.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters