Predators hold off the Senators
The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Nashville won 5-3, but high-danger chances were split 5-5—the Predators outfinished Ottawa in the scoring areas. Expected goals favored Nashville, 56% to 44% (4.27–3.37), and shot attempts nearly tied at 27-26. The real story was efficiency: Nashville converted 60% of its high-danger chances while Ottawa managed 40%.
At even strength, the Predators controlled play and generated more dangerous opportunities. That advantage proved decisive in a contest tighter than the scoreline suggests.
Nashville was lethal off the rush, scoring four goals on 27 attempts to Ottawa's two on 28. On the power play, the Predators were dominant: two goals on seven attempts (0.64 xG). Special teams widened the gap.
J. Saros turned aside 23 of 26 shots (0.885 SV%), while J. Reimer stopped 22 of 26 (0.846 SV%). Both played well; Nashville's skaters simply finished their chances.
The danger ladder
NSH went 3-for-5 from high danger on 1.86 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
OTT finished -0.4 against expected, NSH +0.7 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 0.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 1-for-14, NSH 2-for-15. NSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- NSH was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/5 on HD chances (60%).
- OTT was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
- NSH was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 27 rush chances.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
- NSH created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- OTT created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NSH power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 7 PP shots (0.64 xG).