Backcheck
Recap · OTT at NSH

Predators hold off the Senators

The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:07 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
Home
NSH
Nashville Predators
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.37Expected goals4.27
56% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)27
5High-danger chances5
49Corsi (all attempts)55
Score-adjusted: 42% / 58%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Nashville won 5-3, but high-danger chances were split 5-5—the Predators outfinished Ottawa in the scoring areas. Expected goals favored Nashville, 56% to 44% (4.27–3.37), and shot attempts nearly tied at 27-26. The real story was efficiency: Nashville converted 60% of its high-danger chances while Ottawa managed 40%.

At even strength, the Predators controlled play and generated more dangerous opportunities. That advantage proved decisive in a contest tighter than the scoreline suggests.

Nashville was lethal off the rush, scoring four goals on 27 attempts to Ottawa's two on 28. On the power play, the Predators were dominant: two goals on seven attempts (0.64 xG). Special teams widened the gap.

J. Saros turned aside 23 of 26 shots (0.885 SV%), while J. Reimer stopped 22 of 26 (0.846 SV%). Both played well; Nashville's skaters simply finished their chances.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
OTT2 / 5 · 1.15 xG
NSH3 / 5 · 1.86 xG
Medium dangermid-range
OTT1 / 16 · 1.71 xG
NSH2 / 17 · 1.89 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
OTT0 / 28 · 0.50 xG
NSH0 / 33 · 0.51 xG

NSH went 3-for-5 from high danger on 1.86 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
OTT
3 G · 3.37 xG · -0.4
NSH
5 G · 4.27 xG · +0.7
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. ReimerOTT
+0.3
J. SarosNSH
+0.4

OTT finished -0.4 against expected, NSH +0.7 — J. Saros (NSH) saved 0.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
OTT
WRIST1/14
SLAP0/8
SNAP0/6
BACKHAND1/4
TIP IN1/3
DEFLECTED0/3
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/10
NSH
WRIST2/15
SLAP1/10
SNAP1/4
BACKHAND0/6
TIP IN0/5
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT1/2
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/12
OTT
NSH
Off the rush
2 G on 28 · 2.55 xG
4 G on 27 · 2.64 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.47 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.46 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 1-for-14, NSH 2-for-15. NSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
R. O'Reilly
#90 · C · NSH
0 G · 3 A · 1 SOG · 22:42 TOI · +1
S. Stamkos
#91 · C · NSH
3 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 18:47 TOI · -1
L. Evangelista
#77 · R · NSH
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 13:35 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NSH was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/5 on HD chances (60%).
  • OTT was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • NSH was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • NSH created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 7 PP shots (0.64 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · OTT at NSH · 8:00 PM ET

Senators at Predators: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:04 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
OTT
Model favorite
53%
47%
OTT50NSH

OTT by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score OTT 2.62.4 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

OTT← edge
edge →NSH
56.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
53.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.66xGF / 602.48
2.12xGA / 602.58
2.18Goals for / gm1.84
1.99Goals against / gm2.21
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.992

OTT holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.992) says OTT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. The model projects a OTT 2.6 - 2.4 NSH game with the Senators at 53% win probability.

The Predators are underwater at -9 goal differential over their last 10. The Senators own the underlying play by a comfortable margin. They're generating 56.0% of 5v5 expected goals while limiting Nashville to 49.0%, and controlling territory at 53.0% Corsi% versus 50.0%. These aren't rounding errors—they suggest Nashville will chase the puck all night.

Save percentages and shooting accuracy are nearly identical between the teams, evidenced by PDO figures of 0.993 for Ottawa and 0.992 for Nashville. Luck won't decide this.

The wrinkle is goaltending. Both J. Annunen and J. Reimer are on back-to-backs. Expect either a backup in net or a weary starter—whichever side deploys fresh goaltending holds an advantage.

Players to Watch

OTT

  • Brady Tkachuk — 1.19 xG/60, 11G 20A, 2 HD goals, 7.5% shooting
  • Dylan Cozens — 1.00 xG/60, 13G 15A, 1 HD goals, 9.5% shooting

NSH

  • Zachary L'Heureux — 0.85 xG/60, 4G 0A, 1 HD goals, 16.0% shooting
  • Filip Forsberg — 0.80 xG/60, 23G 17A, 4 HD goals, 13.6% shooting

Tkachuk and Cozens carry Ottawa's offensive load. Tkachuk's 7.5% shooting rate sits well below league average, which means regression is building—if he finishes at even 10%, that's three more goals over the season. Cozens has already converted at 9.5%, a rate that typically sticks. Forsberg has weaponized 0.80 xG/60 into 23 goals through elite high-danger finishing at 13.6%—his efficiency is real, not a mirage. L'Heureux occupies the opposite end: 4 goals on similar volume, shooting at 16.0%, so either a breakout or a regression waits in the data.

Nick Jensen is Ottawa's defensive liability. Jonathan Marchessault serves the same purpose for Nashville. Both are exploitable targets for sustained pressure.

The model's verdict holds: a coin flip with a 53% lean toward Ottawa, contingent on which team gets fresh goaltending and imposes its territorial will.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters