Backcheck
Recap · FLA at NYI

Islanders steal one from the Panthers against the run of play

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.58–2.20 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 5:06 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
FLA
Florida Panthers
4
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.58Expected goals2.20
68% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)26
7High-danger chances2
78Corsi (all attempts)53
Score-adjusted: 58% / 42%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders won 5-4 despite generating just 2.20 expected goals to Florida's 4.58. This was a heist — the Panthers created the better chances (68% of expected goals), but finishing and goaltending flipped the scoreboard.

S. Bobrovsky faced a tougher assignment than his 21/26 save line suggests. He underperformed his xG by 2.80 goals, meaning the Islanders converted chances a goaltender typically denies. D. Rittich overperformed by 0.58 — Florida went 0 for 7 on high-danger chances while New York scored on low-danger opportunities.

The Panthers' quality-per-shot advantage was real: 0.059 xG per attempt versus New York's 0.042. The Islanders held 44% of shot attempts (26–33) but made every dangerous look count.

Anders Lee's wrist shot from the doorstep at 19:28 of the third period was the inflection point. New York's scrappier execution turned the goaltending variance into a win.

The Islanders were lethal off the rush, converting 5 on 24 chances; Florida managed 4 on 32. The Islanders created 3 rebound opportunities, Florida created 10; neither team converted any.

This wasn't about effort. It was about outcome variance working in the wrong team's favor — and New York taking the gift.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
FLA0 / 7 · 1.64 xG
NYI1 / 2 · 0.44 xG
Medium dangermid-range
FLA1 / 18 · 2.06 xG
NYI1 / 10 · 1.08 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
FLA3 / 53 · 0.88 xG
NYI3 / 41 · 0.68 xG

NYI went 3-for-41 from low danger on 0.68 expected goals — 2.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
FLA
4 G · 4.58 xG · -0.6
NYI
5 G · 2.20 xG · +2.8
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. BobrovskyFLA
-2.8
D. RittichNYI
+0.6

FLA finished -0.6 against expected, NYI +2.8 — S. Bobrovsky (FLA) allowed 2.8 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
FLA
SNAP2/29
WRIST0/11
BACKHAND2/9
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/5
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/18
NYI
SNAP3/10
WRIST1/22
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP1/3
TIP IN0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/14
FLA
NYI
Off the rush
4 G on 32 · 2.77 xG
5 G on 24 · 1.76 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 10 · 1.15 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.15 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: FLA went 2-for-29, NYI 3-for-10. NYI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 23:17 TOI · +4
M. Tkachuk
#19 · L · FLA
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 19:16 TOI · -1
A. Ekblad
#5 · D · FLA
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 26:24 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI won despite being outplayed by xG (32%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • NYI had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • S. Bobrovsky (FLA) gave up 2.8 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • FLA had the higher quality looks — 0.059 xG/shot vs 0.042.
  • FLA couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NYI scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • FLA scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • FLA was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • NYI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • FLA created 10 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · FLA at NYI · 6:30 PM ET

Panthers at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 5:05 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
FLA50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score FLA 2.62.6 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

FLA← edge
edge →NYI
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
52.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.48
2.56xGA / 602.69
1.98Goals for / gm1.78
2.21Goals against / gm1.94
0.989PDO — luck, not skill0.993

FLA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.989 vs 0.993) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

This is a coin flip. The model projects a 2.6-2.6 game with the Islanders at 51% win probability—close enough that the deciding factor will be execution, not talent.

The season numbers suggest two reasonably matched teams. Florida's 49.0% expected goals share and 52.0% Corsi percentage point to a team that controls play; the Islanders countered with 48.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi, narrowly behind. Both teams sit at slightly different luck levels—Florida's 0.989 PDO and New York's 0.993 suggest the Islanders have gotten marginally more favorable results than their play deserves, while the Panthers have been just slightly unlucky. If regression matters, this favors Florida.

What separates them right now is form. The Islanders are 7-3-0 in their last 10 games, the hotter team by points pace. Florida, by contrast, hasn't established the same rhythm, making New York the slight favorite despite the underlying numbers suggesting parity.

The Panthers' chief offensive threat is Sam Bennett, who combines elite volume at 0.97 xG/60 with 18 goals and 19 assists on a 13.1% shooting percentage and 6 high-danger goals. Brad Marchand supplies secondary scoring at 0.93 xG/60 with 17 goals and 9 assists, 3 high-danger goals, and a 19.5% shooting percentage.

The Islanders' offense leans on Anders Lee, whose 1.20 xG/60 leads both forward groups despite converting at just 6.4%; his 2 high-danger goals underscore a disconnect between opportunity and finishing. Bo Horvat rounds out the secondary attack at 0.87 xG/60 with 18 goals, 10 assists, 3 high-danger goals, and a 12.8% shooting percentage.

The territorial story favors Florida: the Panthers drive Corsi at 52.0%, meaning they'll spend most of the night in the Islanders' zone. Alexander Romanov emerges as a defensive weak link the Panthers will exploit.

A wrinkle on the back-to-back: both I. Sorokin and D. Tarasov are on consecutive games, raising the possibility of a tired starter or a surprise backup appearance. Whichever goaltender sees action will shape the final margin.

The edge goes to New York by a hair—their recent form and slight luck advantage outweigh Florida's territorial control. But the model is right to call this a pick'em. Bennett and the Panthers' shot generation could easily flip this. Expect a tight game decided by chance bounces.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters