Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at PHI

Blue Jackets edge the Flyers in a shootout

The Blue Jackets won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:11 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
2
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
1
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.80Expected goals2.83
50% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)19
2High-danger chances4
60Corsi (all attempts)52
Score-adjusted: 53% / 47%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Expected goals called this dead even—2.83 to 2.80, Flyers by a hair. High-danger chances said otherwise: Columbus generated four to Philadelphia's two.

K. Marchenko converted at the doorstep with a backhander. The metrics had pointed there: the Blue Jackets outshot the Flyers 28–19 and generated six rebound chances, crashing the net effectively while the Flyers built volume. The Flyers underperformed their expected goals by 1.83 runs—wasting quality looks. Columbus also underperformed, though by half that margin (0.80 below expected). In a game governed by missed chances, the Blue Jackets' misses clustered outside the danger zone and Marchenko buried his.

Both goalies played spectacularly. J. Greaves (CBJ) stopped 18 of 19 for a 0.947 save percentage, running 1.83 goals above model. D. Vladar (PHI) posted 0.964 on 28 saves, also 1.80 above expected. That goaltending duel—combined with Columbus's superior quality in front—determined the result.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ0 / 2 · 0.37 xG
PHI0 / 4 · 0.90 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ1 / 18 · 1.88 xG
PHI1 / 15 · 1.61 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 40 · 0.55 xG
PHI0 / 33 · 0.31 xG

PHI went 0-for-4 from high danger on 0.90 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
2 G · 2.80 xG · -0.8
PHI
1 G · 2.83 xG · -1.8
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GreavesCBJ
+1.8
D. VladarPHI
+1.8

CBJ finished -0.8 against expected, PHI -1.8 — J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 1.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST1/27
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/4
SNAP0/4
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/19
PHI
WRIST0/17
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/3
SNAP0/2
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/20
CBJ
PHI
Off the rush
0 G on 25 · 1.64 xG
1 G on 24 · 2.47 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6 · 0.70 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.15 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 1-for-27, PHI 0-for-17.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Severson
#78 · D · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 23:18 TOI
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
1 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 22:06 TOI
C. Dvorak
#22 · C · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 19:47 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CBJ generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) stopped 1.8 goals above expected.
  • CBJ created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • CBJ underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Greaves (CBJ) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Vladar (PHI) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at PHI · 7:30 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:10 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
PHI
Model favorite
49%
51%
CBJ50PHI

PHI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.42.5 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →PHI
52.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
51.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.63xGF / 602.26
2.43xGA / 602.20
2.12Goals for / gm1.96
1.98Goals against / gm1.82
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.008

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a CBJ 2.4 - 2.5 PHI game with the Flyers at 51% win probability. The Flyers hold a paper-thin edge—essentially a coin flip.

Columbus drives territorial possession. Their Corsi sits at 51.0% against Philadelphia's 48.0%, meaning the Blue Jackets will likely control the boards and force the Flyers to defend their end for stretches. Shot quality tilts Columbus: CBJ's 52.0% xG% against Philadelphia's 51.0% suggests the Jackets are getting marginally cleaner looks.

Yet Philadelphia's underlying numbers aren't far behind. The difference in expected goals per 60 minutes sits within rounding error—both teams hover around parity. Where Philadelphia gains: PDO (1.008 vs 1.003), a proxy for shooting luck and goaltending performance. It's a small edge, but over time such margins compound.

Boone Jenner anchors Columbus's offense. He carries 0.98 xG per 60 with 11 goals and 21 assists, and has chipped in 2 high-danger chances. His 9.6% shooting rate leaves room for regression but suggests efficiency with his looks. Mathieu Olivier runs a comparable workload: 0.89 xG/60, 12 goals and 9 assists, 1 high-danger goal, and a healthier 13.3% shooting rate.

Owen Tippett leads Philadelphia's scoring sheet with 19 goals in 18 assists. His 0.88 xG/60 sits almost flush with Olivier's. Christian Dvorak operates as a secondary engine: 0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 21 assists, and 3 high-danger goals. His 11.2% shooting suggests room for positive variance, though the high-danger total hints at already-efficient placement.

The goaltending situation introduces tactical friction. D. Vladar plays on back-to-back nights, which typically signals either a backup appearance or a fatigued starter. Either scenario favors Philadelphia's forward group—fresh legs against tired ones, or an untested backup absorbing high-volume pressure.

Shot quality and possession edge belong to Columbus. Conversion luck and goaltending depth belong to Philadelphia. The model calls it essentially even, and the math bears that out: both teams excel at what they do, neither project to run away with expected goals, and neither can claim a true offensive or defensive advantage. One bounce the wrong way, one save the other way, and either team advances. That's exactly what 51% looks like.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters