Backcheck
Recap · DET at DAL

Stars edge the Red Wings in overtime

The Stars won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:11 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DET
Detroit Red Wings
2
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.61Expected goals3.44
51% share for the better side
24Shot attempts (SOG)24
6High-danger chances5
53Corsi (all attempts)60
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Stars won 3-2 in overtime despite Detroit's 3.61–3.44 expected-goals advantage. This outcome required Dallas's goaltending to exceed expectations and Detroit's finishers to fall short by identical margins: 1.61 goals each.

J. Oettinger saved 1.61 goals above expected, posting a 0.917 save percentage against six Red Wings high-danger chances. Detroit held five high-danger opportunities, crashed the net for three rebound chances (one converted), and underperformed its xG by 1.61. The underlying structures were even: 24 shots each, quality chances distributed. Dallas separated itself through rush efficiency, scoring 2 goals on 28 chances.

Thomas Harley's snap shot from the high slot at 02:06 of overtime decided the game. J. Gibson, Detroit's starter, finished with a 0.875 save percentage (21/24).

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DET1 / 6 · 1.77 xG
DAL1 / 5 · 1.19 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DET1 / 11 · 1.24 xG
DAL2 / 16 · 1.62 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DET0 / 36 · 0.60 xG
DAL0 / 39 · 0.63 xG

DET went 1-for-6 from high danger on 1.77 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DET
2 G · 3.61 xG · -1.6
DAL
3 G · 3.44 xG · -0.4
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. GibsonDET
+0.4
J. OettingerDAL
+1.6

DET finished -1.6 against expected, DAL -0.4 — J. Oettinger (DAL) saved 1.6 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DET
SNAP1/18
WRIST0/6
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/5
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT1/1
OTHER0/12
DAL
SNAP2/26
WRIST0/5
TIP IN1/4
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/18
DET
DAL
Off the rush
1 G on 22 · 2.37 xG
2 G on 28 · 2.62 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 3 · 0.83 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.10 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: DET went 1-for-18, DAL 2-for-26. DAL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:52 TOI · +1
M. Seider
#53 · D · DET
0 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 27:44 TOI
T. Harley
#55 · D · DAL
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 22:43 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Oettinger (DAL) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • DET created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DET underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Oettinger (DAL) saved 1.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DET at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Red Wings at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:10 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
DAL
Model favorite
46%
54%
DET50DAL

DAL by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score DET 2.32.5 DAL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DET← edge
edge →DAL
49.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.38xGF / 602.36
2.50xGA / 602.29
1.73Goals for / gm2.07
2.07Goals against / gm1.68
0.985PDO — luck, not skill1.024

DAL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.985 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.3–2.5 goal game with Dallas at 54% win probability. This is as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Dallas is the hotter team: 9-0-1 in their last 10 games. Detroit is underwater, sitting at minus-5 goal differential over the same span—a team failing to finish.

The five-on-five picture is more nuanced. Dallas leads in expected goals at 51.0% but trails in Corsi (47.0% vs. Detroit's 49.0%), generating higher-quality chances while ceding volume. Dallas's PDO of 1.024 tells the real story: the Stars are running hot and bound for regression, while Detroit's 0.985 PDO suggests puck luck has abandoned them.

Watch for J. Oettinger to either start on back-to-back rest or yield to Dallas's backup. That decision will matter.

Players to Watch

Detroit: Alex DeBrincat (0.88 xG/60, 17G 28A, 2 HD goals, 9.0% shooting) and Marco Kasper (0.81 xG/60, 7G 8A, 1 HD goal, 6.1% shooting) carry the offensive load. Kasper's suppressed shooting rate suggests positive regression ahead.

Dallas: Jason Robertson (0.96 xG/60, 25G 21A, 2 HD goals, 12.4% shooting) is the far more dangerous scorer. Michael Bunting (0.83 xG/60, 8G 14A, 7.6% shooting) adds depth.

Detroit's defensive weak link is Axel Sandin-Pellikka. Dallas's is Tyler Myers.

The Stars' superior pacing and Dallas's marginal five-on-five advantage should favor the home team. But Detroit's puck-luck deficit colliding with Dallas's unsustainable PDO make this exactly what the model says: a toss.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters