Backcheck
Recap · LAK at NYR

Kings pull away from the Rangers

The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 8:10 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
4
Home
NYR
New York Rangers
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.46Expected goals2.31
60% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)22
5High-danger chances3
53Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Rangers held 46% of shot attempts yet finished with just 2.31 expected goals against LA's 3.46—a gap revealing how thoroughly outmatched they were. The 4-1 scoreline is no fluke; it matches underlying play exactly.

D. Kuemper and I. Shesterkin determined the scale of the rout. Kuemper stopped 21 of 22, exceeding expectations by 1.31 goals. Shesterkin allowed 3 on 25 shots, his 0.880 save percentage worth 1.31 goals toward the deficit. On high-danger chances, the Kings converted 2 of 5; the Rangers generated just 3 in that theater.

LA operated with precision. They posted 0.065 expected goals per shot versus New York's 0.045—an edge that compounded through net crashing. Seven rebound opportunities, two converted, punished defensive lapses.

Trevor Moore's wrist shot from the wing at 18:12 of the third period was academic. The outcome had been settled earlier.

A. Laferriere led with 1 goal and 2 assists over 18:51. M. Anderson added 1 goal and 1 assist in 20:58. Q. Byfield contributed 2 assists over 18:58.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK2 / 5 · 1.53 xG
NYR1 / 3 · 0.59 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK1 / 13 · 1.29 xG
NYR0 / 11 · 1.22 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK1 / 35 · 0.64 xG
NYR0 / 37 · 0.50 xG

NYR went 0-for-11 from medium danger on 1.22 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
4 G · 3.46 xG · +0.5
NYR
1 G · 2.31 xG · -1.3
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. KuemperLAK
+1.3
I. ShesterkinNYR
+0.5

LAK finished +0.5 against expected, NYR -1.3 — D. Kuemper (LAK) saved 1.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
WRIST4/29
TIP IN0/3
SNAP0/3
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/14
NYR
WRIST0/24
TIP IN1/7
SNAP0/4
SLAP0/1
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/13
LAK
NYR
Off the rush
0 G on 24 · 1.54 xG
1 G on 20 · 1.47 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 7 · 0.94 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.20 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: LAK went 4-for-29, NYR 0-for-24.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Laferriere
#14 · R · LAK
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:51 TOI · +2
M. Anderson
#44 · D · LAK
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 20:58 TOI · +2
Q. Byfield
#55 · R · LAK
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:58 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) stopped 1.3 goals above expected.
  • LAK had the higher quality looks — 0.065 xG/shot vs 0.045.
  • LAK was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • LAK created 7 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at NYR · 7:00 PM ET

Kings at Rangers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 7:30 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
LAK
Model favorite
51%
49%
LAK50NYR

LAK by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score LAK 2.42.3 NYR; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →NYR
52.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
52.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.42xGF / 602.26
2.20xGA / 602.40
1.85Goals for / gm1.88
1.71Goals against / gm1.90
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.009

LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.009) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models say coin flip: 2.4 expected goals for the Kings, 2.3 for New York, with LA at 51% to win. When an algorithm can't decide, the market shouldn't either.

The Rangers look the part of favorites — 6-2-2 over their last ten games. The Kings have crumbled under the same lens, sitting at -9 goal differential in that stretch. But here's where it gets interesting: the teams' underlying mechanics are inverted. LA owns the 5v5 play. The Kings are generating 52.0% expected goals compared to 48.0% for the Rangers; they're driving territorial advantage too, holding 52.0% Corsi. The Rangers are winning on points (and PDO — they're running 1.009 to LA's 1.002) despite getting outworked.

This is the true tension: the Kings have been sloppy converting, while the Rangers have run hot. Neither should persist.

Watch Alex Laferriere for LA. He's generating 0.87 expected goals per 60 minutes with 16 goals and 18 assists, a 9.9% shooter who has two high-danger goals. Across the ice, Adam Sykora has been the Rangers' most dangerous finisher — 3 goals on 1 assist, but his 0.91 xG/60 and 20.0% shooting rate suggest he's getting quality looks. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 11 assists, 2 high-danger goals, 13.1% shooting) is the secondary threat who stays dangerous.

Jared Wright, contributing 0.83 xG/60 for the Kings despite zero goals, illustrates LA's underlying problem: generation without finish. That he's pointless so far doesn't mean he's playing poorly — the opposite. For both teams, the defensive vulnerabilities — Adrian Kempe for LA, Vincent Iorio for the Rangers — represent where the other team will hunt.

The model's indecision is justified. The Rangers are riding a wave that may cool; the Kings own the process but have had execution fail them. One team will break through, and the deciding factor will likely be exactly who finishes their chances when they get them. Both teams are primed for it.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters