Backcheck
Recap · NYI at OTT

Senators run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 7:52 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
2
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.12Expected goals4.93
70% share for the better side
19Shot attempts (SOG)27
3High-danger chances10
45Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Senators won 3-2, but that scoreline understates their dominance: 70% of 5v5 expected goals (4.93–2.12), 59% of shot attempts, and a 10–3 high-danger chance edge. Ottawa generated elite-level play and nearly squandered it.

They underperformed their xG by 1.93 goals. I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 1.93 goals above expected, including 90% on high-danger shots. That's the game: Ottawa's missed chances met Sorokin's elite saves.

The Islanders stayed competitive through transition. Two goals on 19 rush attempts is a conversion rate that normally ends seasons. But they lacked the volume to hang even. Ottawa crashed the net relentlessly—9 rebound opportunities generated, 2 converted—and produced far more dangerous looks. Their 0.085 xG per shot versus NYI's 0.047 showed the quality gap.

Brady Tkachuk's wrist shot from the doorstep (P3, 19:47) broke the game open.

J. Reimer (OTT) made 17 of 19 (0.895 SV%), a solid floor. I. Sorokin's 24 of 27 (0.889 SV%) looked average in rate but he saved 1.93 more goals than expected, keeping what could have been a three-goal loss to just one.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI0 / 3 · 0.68 xG
OTT1 / 10 · 2.72 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI1 / 11 · 1.21 xG
OTT1 / 15 · 1.64 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI1 / 31 · 0.22 xG
OTT1 / 33 · 0.57 xG

OTT went 1-for-10 from high danger on 2.72 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
2 G · 2.12 xG · -0.1
OTT
3 G · 4.93 xG · -1.9
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+1.9
J. ReimerOTT
+0.1

NYI finished -0.1 against expected, OTT -1.9 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 1.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST0/14
SLAP1/4
SNAP0/5
TIP IN1/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
POKE0/0
OTHER0/17
OTT
WRIST2/22
SLAP0/6
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/7
BACKHAND1/4
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/11
NYI
OTT
Off the rush
2 G on 19 · 1.79 xG
1 G on 26 · 2.21 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.16 xG
2 G on 9 · 2.36 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-14, OTT 2-for-22. NYI scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
1 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 24:11 TOI · +2
B. Horvat
#14 · C · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:39 TOI · +1
T. Kleven
#43 · D · OTT
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:06 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 1.9 goals above expected.
  • OTT generated far more dangerous chances — 0.085 xG/shot vs 0.047. Quality over quantity.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 19 rush chances.
  • OTT created 9 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT underperformed xG by 1.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 1.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • I. Sorokin was a wall on HD chances — 90% SV on 10 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at OTT · 7:00 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Islanders on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 8:12 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

59%
OTT
Model favorite
41%
59%
NYI50OTT

OTT by 18 points of win probability — a clear lean. Projected score NYI 2.32.8 OTT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →OTT
48.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
49.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.48xGF / 602.66
2.69xGA / 602.12
1.78Goals for / gm2.18
1.94Goals against / gm1.99
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.993) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a NYI 2.3-2.8 OTT game with the Senators at 59% win probability. That lean rests on clear dominance in five-on-five play that favors territory and shot volume.

The Senators generate 56.0% of expected goals at 5v5 compared to the Islanders' 48.0%. They control possession at 53.0% Corsi% versus New York's 49.0%. Both teams carry identical 0.993 PDO—which means the edge isn't variance or luck, but shot quality and volume. Ottawa is simply creating better looks from better positions.

L. Ullmark, on the second half of a back-to-back, injects uncertainty into New York's net. Whether he starts or a backup gets the call, the Islanders face a goaltending variable that could matter if play tightens.

The offensive weapons tell different stories. Anders Lee (1.20 xG/60, 9G 20A, 6.4% shooting) drives through volume while Bo Horvat (0.87 xG/60, 18G 10A, 12.8% shooting) leans on efficiency—two approaches to generating offense. Ottawa counters with Brady Tkachuk (1.19 xG/60, 11G 20A, 7.5% shooting) and Dylan Cozens (1.00 xG/60, 13G 15A, 9.5% shooting), who similarly split their offensive identity between shot creation and execution.

On the back end, Alexander Romanov represents New York's defensive exposure while Nick Jensen fills that role for Ottawa. Neither team scores through high-danger or rebound chances, so this game belongs to whoever controls territory and shot volume—exactly where Ottawa has built its edge. The 59% win probability isn't about star names. It's about who dominates the underlying play.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters