Backcheck
Recap · NYR at CBJ

Blue Jackets run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 8:14 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
3
Home
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.81Expected goals4.92
64% share for the better side
25Shot attempts (SOG)37
5High-danger chances7
46Corsi (all attempts)61
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus dominated New York on the scoreboard and every metric that mattered. The 6-3 win marked a game where the Blue Jackets didn't just rack up volume — they dictated the terms of offensive opportunity.

The underlying picture was lopsided: 64% of expected goals (4.92–2.81) tilted Columbus's way. This wasn't a volume advantage masking poor shot quality. Columbus generated 0.081 expected goals per shot; New York managed 0.061. Over a full season, that kind of quality gap compounds into a substantial win-loss difference.

Columbus pressed the edge aggressively. In the high-danger area, where chances convert at a rate far above average, Columbus buried 3 of 7 opportunities (43%). New York got 5 high-danger looks and converted one. The Blue Jackets also crashed the net for 6 rebound chances, cashing in twice; the Rangers created 4 rebound opportunities and scored on none.

The shot attempts tilted 60–40 (37–25 on goal). But that frame alone undersells the control. When you weight shots by their quality, the dominance grew. J. Greaves stopped 22 of 25 shots (0.880 SV%) for Columbus. I. Shesterkin turned aside 31 of 36 (0.861 SV%) for New York—solid work, not enough to steal it.

Adam Fantilli's wrist shot from the point at 17:06 of the third period proved the turning point, a moment that reflected Columbus's sustained pressure.

Z. Werenski led the charge with three assists in 24:09, anchoring the team's drive. M. Zibanejad (1G, 1A) and A. Lafrenière (1G, 1A) kept New York competitive, but the Rangers never seized the initiative. Columbus didn't outscore New York by accident—they out-chanced them, out-skilled them, and finished their work.

  • #8 Z. Werenski (CBJ) — 3A in 24:09
  • #93 M. Zibanejad (NYR) — 1G, 1A in 23:40
  • #13 A. Lafrenière (NYR) — 1G, 1A in 21:51
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 5 · 1.35 xG
CBJ3 / 7 · 1.89 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 10 · 0.94 xG
CBJ3 / 22 · 2.55 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 31 · 0.52 xG
CBJ0 / 32 · 0.48 xG

CBJ went 3-for-7 from high danger on 1.89 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
3 G · 2.81 xG · +0.2
CBJ
6 G · 4.92 xG · +1.1
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. ShesterkinNYR
-0.1
J. GreavesCBJ
-0.2

NYR finished +0.2 against expected, CBJ +1.1 — J. Greaves (CBJ) allowed 0.2 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
SNAP1/9
WRIST1/12
SLAP0/7
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/0
OTHER0/10
CBJ
SNAP2/19
WRIST3/15
SLAP0/7
TIP IN1/2
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/13
NYR
CBJ
Off the rush
3 G on 19 · 1.74 xG
3 G on 28 · 2.85 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.66 xG
2 G on 6 · 1.17 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-9, CBJ 2-for-19. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
0 G · 3 A · 5 SOG · 24:09 TOI · +2
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 23:40 TOI · -1
A. Lafrenière
#13 · L · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 21:51 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CBJ generated far more dangerous chances — 0.081 xG/shot vs 0.061. Quality over quantity.
  • CBJ was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/7 on HD chances (43%).
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 19 rush chances.
  • CBJ created 6 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at CBJ · 7:00 PM ET

The Blue Jackets are the model's lean over the Rangers on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 7:54 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
CBJ
Model favorite
45%
55%
NYR50CBJ

CBJ by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.32.6 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →CBJ
48.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
49.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.26xGF / 602.63
2.40xGA / 602.43
1.88Goals for / gm2.12
1.90Goals against / gm1.98
1.009PDO — luck, not skill1.003

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 1.003) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.3 to 2.6 goal final with Columbus holding 55% win probability. That confidence rests on 5v5 control: the Blue Jackets lead 52.0% expected goals to 48.0%, with matching edge in Corsi at 51.0% to 49.0%. New York's PDO sits at 1.009, inflated by luck; Columbus at 1.003 plays closer to its predictive mean.

The margin is slight but durable. Columbus generates more per shot attempt.

The Players

Adam Sykora drives New York's offense at 0.91 expected goals per 60 minutes, converting at 20.0% with 3 goals and 1 assist. That shooting rate will regress. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60) has 8 goals and 11 assists with 2 high-danger goals, shooting 13.1%—steadier but secondary.

Columbus counters with Boone Jenner at 0.98 xG/60, leading this group. Jenner has 11 goals and 21 assists with 2 high-danger goals. Mathieu Olivier (0.89 xG/60) has 12 goals and 9 assists with 1 high-danger goal, shooting 13.3%. Both Blue Jackets wings outpace their New York counterparts in underlying creation.

The Details

Vincent Iorio is the defensive liability for New York; Conor Garland for Columbus. Neither team has converted high-danger or rebound chances, suggesting either defensive discipline or offensive imprecision near the net.

J. Quick plays on a back-to-back. Expect fatigue or a bench option.

The model reads the underlying play correctly. Columbus is tighter in shot quality and volume. By the numbers, the Blue Jackets are the play.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters