Backcheck
Recap · PIT at OTT

Penguins edge the Senators in a shootout

The Penguins earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 9:05 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PIT
Pittsburgh Penguins
4
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.99Expected goals4.52
57% share for the better side
40Shot attempts (SOG)29
10High-danger chances9
80Corsi (all attempts)63
Score-adjusted: 56% / 44%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Penguins controlled this game—57% of 5v5 expected goals (5.99–4.52)—yet needed a shootout to beat Ottawa 4-3. Pittsburgh created 10 high-danger chances but converted none, underperforming their 5.99 xG by 1.99 goals. Ottawa underperformed its 4.52 xG by 1.52.

Pittsburgh dominated the shot count 40–29 and expected-goal margin at all danger levels. An open game with 19 combined high-danger chances still came down to variance—both teams misfired when it mattered most. Pittsburgh crashed the net effectively but converted 0 of 9 rebound opportunities.

S. Skinner saved 1.52 goals above expected for Pittsburgh (26 saves, 0.897 SV%). L. Ullmark saved 2.99 above expected for Ottawa (37 saves, 0.925 SV%). Ben Kindel's shootout goal broke the stalemate.

Pittsburgh was lethal on the rush: 3 goals on 34 chances. Ottawa: 2 goals on 32.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PIT0 / 10 · 2.25 xG
OTT2 / 9 · 2.19 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PIT2 / 30 · 3.07 xG
OTT0 / 15 · 1.62 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PIT1 / 40 · 0.67 xG
OTT1 / 39 · 0.70 xG

PIT went 0-for-10 from high danger on 2.25 expected goals — 2.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PIT
4 G · 5.99 xG · -2.0
OTT
3 G · 4.52 xG · -1.5
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. SkinnerPIT
+1.5
L. UllmarkOTT
+3.0

PIT finished -2.0 against expected, OTT -1.5 — L. Ullmark (OTT) saved 3.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PIT
WRIST1/38
SNAP1/11
SLAP1/7
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/13
OTT
WRIST2/19
SNAP0/9
SLAP0/8
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND1/6
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/15
PIT
OTT
Off the rush
3 G on 34 · 3.32 xG
2 G on 32 · 3.79 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 9 · 1.48 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.31 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PIT went 1-for-38, OTT 2-for-19. PIT scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
E. Karlsson
#65 · D · PIT
1 G · 2 A · 8 SOG · 26:08 TOI · +1
R. Rakell
#67 · R · PIT
2 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 20:52 TOI · +1
T. Stützle
#18 · C · OTT
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 23:21 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Skinner (PIT) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 19 high-danger chances combined (OTT 9, PIT 10).
  • PIT couldn't convert — 0/10 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • PIT was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
  • PIT created 9 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT underperformed xG by 1.5 — wasted quality chances.
  • PIT underperformed xG by 3.0 — wasted quality chances.
  • S. Skinner (PIT) saved 1.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • L. Ullmark (OTT) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PIT at OTT · 7:00 PM ET

The Senators are the model's lean over the Penguins on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 8:51 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

56%
OTT
Model favorite
44%
56%
PIT50OTT

OTT by 12 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score PIT 2.42.7 OTT; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PIT← edge
edge →OTT
51.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
50.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.66xGF / 602.66
2.55xGA / 602.12
2.45Goals for / gm2.18
2.12Goals against / gm1.99
1.012PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.012 vs 0.993) says PIT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4-2.7 goal game favoring Ottawa, with the Senators at 56% win probability. That edge rests on a commanding disparity in shot quality: the underlying numbers say Pittsburgh is being outplayed, and Ottawa's recent run confirms it.

Ottawa has a clear form advantage. The Senators went 8-2-0 over their last 10 games, while Pittsburgh sits at -7 goal differential over the same span. The Penguins are losing ground despite their underlying metrics suggesting they should be competitive.

The season 5v5 picture explains why. Ottawa owns 56.0% expected goals compared to Pittsburgh's 51.0%, and territory tilts the same way: Senators at 53.0% Corsi to the Penguins' 50.0%. Pittsburgh's PDO of 1.012 suggests some luck has carried them through; Ottawa's 0.993 implies the Senators have been snakebitten relative to their play.

Rickard Rakell is Pittsburgh's primary threat, generating 1.01 xG/60 with 13 goals and 3 high-danger goals. His 12.1% shooting rate is elevated and may not sustain. Filip Hallander has been recalled from conditioning but faces further evaluation—his status is uncertain. He's been generating 1.28 xG/60 but has yet to score.

Ottawa's attack centers on Brady Tkachuk, who produces 1.19 xG/60 and 11 goals with 2 high-danger goals. At 7.5% shooting, he's efficient on quality looks. Dylan Cozens is similarly potent: 1.00 xG/60, 13 goals, 1 high-danger goal, and 9.5% shooting.

Neither team has generated secondary scoring: both sit at 0% for high-danger goals and rebounds. Pittsburgh's weak link is Caleb Jones; Ottawa's is Nick Jensen. The game will likely turn on which team's top scorers hit their expected rate and which defense cracks first.

Ottawa's edges are real and supported by recent performance. The model sees a Senators team that outworks opponents across most measurable dimensions and has the form to prove it.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PIT
Filip Hallander0G 3A
1.28 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Rickard Rakell13G 13A
1.01 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.1% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters