Backcheck
Recap · FLA at NYI

Islanders run the Panthers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Islanders earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 9:13 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
FLA
Florida Panthers
2
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.97Expected goals7.32
71% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)40
5High-danger chances13
60Corsi (all attempts)75
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders beat the Panthers 5-2, but the scoreline understates the gap. New York controlled 71% of expected goals at 5v5 (7.32–2.97)—a dominance the final tally barely hints at. The shot-attempt margin (40–21, 66%) reinforced it.

The Islanders generated far more dangerous chances: 13–5 in high-danger attempts. They shot at 0.098 expected goals per attempt to Florida's 0.049. The Panthers couldn't finish: 0 for 5 on high-danger attempts.

New York had 7.32 expected goals but scored just 5. D. Tarasov (35/40, 0.875 SV%) was why, saving 2.32 above expected. I. Sorokin (19/21, 0.905 SV%) was also sharp, at +0.97.

Off the rush, the Islanders scored 3 times on 31 attempts; Florida managed 2 on 26. New York also converted three low-danger opportunities—the kind of variance that doesn't survive the playoffs.

B. Schenn (1G, 2A) and M. Schaefer (2A in 27:51) drove the offense. M. Tkachuk (2G) carried Florida, but one player can't outrun a dominated team.

The underlying numbers promised a blowout. A 5-2 score just looks tighter than the hockey was.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
FLA0 / 5 · 1.07 xG
NYI1 / 13 · 4.61 xG
Medium dangermid-range
FLA2 / 10 · 1.14 xG
NYI1 / 19 · 1.85 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
FLA0 / 45 · 0.75 xG
NYI3 / 43 · 0.86 xG

NYI went 1-for-13 from high danger on 4.61 expected goals — 3.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
FLA
2 G · 2.97 xG · -1.0
NYI
5 G · 7.32 xG · -2.3
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. TarasovFLA
+2.3
I. SorokinNYI
+1.0

FLA finished -1.0 against expected, NYI -2.3 — D. Tarasov (FLA) saved 2.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
FLA
SNAP0/11
WRIST0/12
SLAP0/10
BACKHAND1/3
TIP IN0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BETWEEN LEGS1/1
POKE0/1
BAT0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/18
NYI
SNAP3/32
WRIST2/11
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/8
TIP IN0/5
DEFLECTED0/0
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
POKE0/0
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/13
FLA
NYI
Off the rush
2 G on 26 · 2.33 xG
3 G on 31 · 2.82 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.29 xG
1 G on 7 · 1.31 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: FLA went 0-for-11, NYI 3-for-32. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Schenn
#10 · C · NYI
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 19:22 TOI · +1
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 27:51 TOI · +3
M. Tkachuk
#19 · L · FLA
2 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 23:43 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Tarasov (FLA) stopped 2.3 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 18 high-danger chances combined (NYI 13, FLA 5).
  • NYI generated far more dangerous chances — 0.098 xG/shot vs 0.049. Quality over quantity.
  • FLA couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NYI scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 31 rush chances.
  • FLA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • NYI created 7 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • FLA created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYI underperformed xG by 2.3 — wasted quality chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · FLA at NYI · 1:00 PM ET

Panthers at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 9:33 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
FLA50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score FLA 2.62.6 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

FLA← edge
edge →NYI
49.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
52.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.48xGF / 602.48
2.56xGA / 602.69
1.98Goals for / gm1.78
2.21Goals against / gm1.94
0.989PDO — luck, not skill0.993

FLA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.989 vs 0.993) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.6–2.6 game with the Islanders at 51% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Neither team holds a decisive advantage at even strength. Florida's 52.0% Corsi suggests territorial dominance, but this evaporates in shot quality—the Panthers sit at 49.0% xG%, nearly even with New York's 48.0%. The Islanders' 0.993 PDO runs above league average; Florida's 0.989 suggests the reverse. In a tight game, small deviations compound.

The Panthers' puck possession edge means more time in the offensive zone, but generating chances and capitalizing on them are different skills. Sam Bennett (0.97 xG/60, 18G 19A, 6 HD goals) and Brad Marchand (0.93 xG/60, 17G 9A, 3 HD goals, 19.5% shooting) anchor Florida's scoring. Marchand hasn't played in 22 days and is likely unavailable, removing a 19.5% shooter—significant in a one-goal game.

New York counters with Anders Lee (1.20 xG/60, 9G 20A, 2 HD goals, 6.4% shooting) and Bo Horvat (0.87 xG/60, 18G 10A, 3 HD goals, 12.8% shooting). Lee generates chances at elite volume but converts at a pedestrian 6.4%, while Horvat sits closer to the mean—more predictable, less volatile.

Defensively, Brad Marchand is a weak link for Florida; Alexander Romanov fills the same role for the Islanders. In a game this tight, these liabilities matter.

The zero-HD-goal rates reported for both teams likely reflect data limitations rather than actual play, so that metric carries minimal predictive weight.

In a game where possession favors Florida and special-teams luck could swing either direction, the Islanders' 51% edge likely reflects home-ice advantage and slightly elevated conversion rates. With Marchand sidelined and both teams executing at nearly identical rates, don't expect a blowout. This is a genuine toss-up.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters